[abb]

There were two articles in the WSJ late last week on this subject, suggesting the cuts to 401K’s. Never was there a name attached to the suggestions.

[catnipman]

“There were two articles in the WSJ”

you’re talking about Rupert Murdoch’s personal anti-Trump blog, right?

[Grampa Dave]

“There were two articles in the WSJ late last week on this subject, suggesting the cuts to 401K’s. Never was there a name attached to the suggestions.”

Typical of the WSJ, controlled by the Murdoch’s.

Remember their polls showing how Trump was losing to Clintoon?

[DoughtyOne]

Thanks abb.

Sounds made up to me.

[faithhopecharity]

the Wall Str Journal has really gone downhill in its objectivity, editorial standards

not that I’m claiming it was ever perfect but it did formerly do better than the least couple of years

[taildragger]

"There were two articles in the WSJ late last week on this subject, suggesting the cuts to 401K’s. Never was there a name attached to the suggestions."

So is the WSJ just a swamp tool as well? I'd say so.

PDJT has the mother of all weeks last week with a DOW of 23,000, ISIS getting wiped out officially, and the 1st budget in 8 years and we are possibly on the verge of a tax deal.

If you are an E-GOPer or a wackadoodle Congresswomen with a big and ugly hat, would you compliment the guy or team making accomplishments, or would you cause disharmony and distractions when what you really need to buy a big Red Ferrari to compensate because you haven't done Ugats...