1 posted on
10/17/2017 9:31:48 PM PDT by
bitt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
To: bitt
2 posted on
10/17/2017 9:33:30 PM PDT by
bitt
(press takes him literally, but not seriously; his supporters take him seriously, but not literally)
To: bitt
“It has been reported . . . .”
Now there’s a phrase that ought to spark great confidence!
To: bitt
Another rabbit hole. The only option left is to strip to the minimum what the intel community can do. They can’t be trusted, obviously.
5 posted on
10/17/2017 9:40:31 PM PDT by
lodi90
To: bitt
samantha power would deny being a woman if she thought it would benefit her
6 posted on
10/17/2017 9:41:56 PM PDT by
Bob434
To: bitt
9 posted on
10/17/2017 9:44:35 PM PDT by
kabar
To: bitt
10 posted on
10/17/2017 9:44:56 PM PDT by
CPT Clay
To: bitt
I guess she looked around at the Clintons and decided not to take the fall. The next question will be if it was Obama or Clinton people who falsified the requests.
A: Sessions, Sessions, Sessions?
B: Oh, he’s sick.
11 posted on
10/17/2017 9:45:11 PM PDT by
VanShuyten
("...that all the donkeys were dead. I know nothing as to the fate of the less valuable animals.")
To: bitt
I don’t assume Power is telling the truth, but she may be. Being an Obunga insider, very doubtful.
To: bitt
"We've got to get to the bottom of that." Hans Blix is on the case.
13 posted on
10/17/2017 9:47:34 PM PDT by
deadrock
To: bitt
It’s a shame that nobody keeps records in the government...then we’d know for sure. /sarc
To: bitt
Wherher she unmasked 26 or 260 makes no difference, this is a fracking crime. sheesh. What the heck are we discussing here?
To: bitt
Her husband is Cass Sunstein...
Who was her top aide and second in command?
16 posted on
10/17/2017 9:59:35 PM PDT by
piasa
(...)
To: bitt
Church lady voice : “Was it ... PU-tin?”
17 posted on
10/17/2017 10:02:20 PM PDT by
piasa
(...)
To: bitt
Either she did or she didn’t. This isn’t that hard. If an intelligence official made them in her name?...This would mean collusion on many levels defrauding the FISA court. More than a minor problem.
To: bitt
This scandal just grows and grows! Either she is lying to the House committee OR someone else was making numerous “unmasking” requests in her name — and/or someone in an extremely sensitive position in the intel community was cooperating in this massive abuse of the process (to allow unmaskings while someone attributed them in the records to the wrong official).
Wow, if only we had an Attorney General who was worth more than a warm cup of spit!!
19 posted on
10/17/2017 10:12:34 PM PDT by
Enchante
(Bill, Anthony, Harvey .... how does lesbo Hillary manage to surround herself with male predators???)
To: bitt
Trey Gowdy = Mr. Worthless.
20 posted on
10/17/2017 10:13:19 PM PDT by
MNDude
(God is not a Republican, but Satan is certainly a Democratt)
To: bitt
It still begs the questions: How many unmasks did she request ? of who ? and why ?
24 posted on
10/17/2017 10:31:15 PM PDT by
stylin19a
(Lynch & Clinton - Snakes on a Plane)
To: bitt
Another Gowdy hearing that will go nowhere.
28 posted on
10/18/2017 12:23:24 AM PDT by
taxesareforever
(Islam is an ideology. It is NOT a religion.)
To: bitt
30 posted on
10/18/2017 12:41:34 AM PDT by
Lopeover
(The 2016 Election is about allegiance to the United States!)
To: bitt
34 posted on
10/18/2017 2:34:34 AM PDT by
cynwoody
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson