Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US judge blocks latest Trump travel restrictions to the US from eight countries (This again?)
CNBC ^

Posted on 10/17/2017 1:17:29 PM PDT by servo1969

A federal judge in Hawaii blocked President Donald Trump's latest bid to impose restrictions on citizens from eight countries entering the United States, which had been set to take effect this week.

The open-ended ban, announced last month, targeted people from Iran, Libya, Syria, Yemen, Somalia, Chad and North Korea, as well as certain government officials from Venezuela. It was the latest version of a policy that had previously targeted six Muslim-majority countries but had been restricted by the Supreme Court.

U.S. District Judge Derrick Watson on Tuesday granted Hawaii's request to temporarily block the federal government from enforcing the policy. It was supposed to take effect at midnight Wednesday.

Hawaii argues the updated ban is a continuation of President Donald Trump's "promise to exclude Muslims from the United States."

(Excerpt) Read more at cnbc.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Hawaii
KEYWORDS: ban; hawaii; travel; trump; trumptravelban
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last
Okay, now, this is literally the same garbage all over again. They have no legal standing to do any of this. Are they trying force Trump to ignore them? Just so they can accuse him of violating the law?
1 posted on 10/17/2017 1:17:29 PM PDT by servo1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: servo1969

Time to start jailing judges for frivolous rulings.


2 posted on 10/17/2017 1:19:18 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (You can't have totalitarian globalist government if the peasants are armed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: servo1969

We knew this was coming. We’re ready for him.


3 posted on 10/17/2017 1:19:54 PM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: admin

Sorry, I seem to have forgotten the author and date.

Tucker Higgins
10-17-2017


4 posted on 10/17/2017 1:20:50 PM PDT by servo1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

I don’t know if they can be jailed but I was thinking the same thing which is enough is enough. This is nothing but a political operation run behind the black robes of some court room. When does a superior court slap down these asshats?


5 posted on 10/17/2017 1:22:16 PM PDT by Mouton (The MSM is a clear and present danger to the republic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Watson is a slow learner.


6 posted on 10/17/2017 1:22:42 PM PDT by ptsal ( Get your facts first, then you can distort them as you please. - M. Twain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: servo1969

Why oh why has this not been struck down with prejudice already? The President demonstrably has the authority to determine who can and cannot enter the country, and is allowed to do so on whatever basis he deems necessary. On top of this, it’s patently obvious that North Korea and Venezuela are not even minority-Muslim countries, so Muslim immigration from those countries is therefore negligible and the ban cannot be said to target Muslims.


7 posted on 10/17/2017 1:22:52 PM PDT by Little Pig
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: servo1969

let him enforce it


8 posted on 10/17/2017 1:23:33 PM PDT by dontreadthis (I finally came up with this tagline)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: servo1969

Ignore the ruling.

And Congress should impeach and remove this wayward errant judge.

At this point, this judge is an enemy combatant—working for the Left.


9 posted on 10/17/2017 1:24:16 PM PDT by exit82 (The opposition has already been Trumped!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: servo1969

This communist judge will not allow Trump to ban travelers from North Korea which is building an ICBM to kill us all? And somehow a ban which doesn’t apply only to Muslim countries is now also a Muslim ban? Sure maybe all 50 states should each determine foreign policy with North Korea.


10 posted on 10/17/2017 1:28:42 PM PDT by Williams (Stop tolerating the intolerant.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: exit82

Of course the judge should be impeached but we have a congress which is now 50% or more Socialist Communist.


11 posted on 10/17/2017 1:29:20 PM PDT by Williams (Stop tolerating the intolerant.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: servo1969
The judge needs a sharp note from the SCOTUS:

"Judge. Cease and decease!

(Stop!)

SCOTUS"

12 posted on 10/17/2017 1:29:38 PM PDT by Right Wing Assault (Kill: NFL, Hollywood, NBA, BLM, CAIR, Antifa, SPLC, CNN, ESPN, NPR, TWITTER, FACEBOOK)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: servo1969

Well, at least he’s consistent, although he is verrrrrry sloooooow learner.


13 posted on 10/17/2017 1:32:43 PM PDT by bagman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: servo1969

Trump should ignore this scumbag “judge”. What will he do then?


14 posted on 10/17/2017 1:32:54 PM PDT by beethovenfan (I always try to maximize my carbon footprint.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: servo1969

Republicans are probably quietly celebrating this nonsense.


15 posted on 10/17/2017 1:34:29 PM PDT by Starboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: servo1969

When did we become a country run by judges? I must have missed the memo.


16 posted on 10/17/2017 1:35:48 PM PDT by precisionshootist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: servo1969

Congress has full power over the “inferior courts.” Its time to stop being so ball-less, and elimate a few of these “circus” courts to demonstrate power belongs to ELECTED representatives.


17 posted on 10/17/2017 1:37:11 PM PDT by PGR88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: servo1969

Since the judge is in direct knowing and purposeful opposition to direct USSC rulings against him, this is grounds for impeachment.


18 posted on 10/17/2017 1:38:34 PM PDT by Seruzawa (TANSTAAFL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: servo1969

Of course. What they want is for Trump to defy the court so the liberals in both Congress and the media can blast him for being above the law.

He needs to let the AG handle this. The SC has already allowed his previous Immigration order to remain pending a full hearing before the USSC and I am of the opinion this lower court ruling will be reversed.


19 posted on 10/17/2017 1:38:41 PM PDT by billyboy15
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: precisionshootist
When did we become a country run by judges? I must have missed the memo.

Marbury v. Madison 1803

20 posted on 10/17/2017 1:40:39 PM PDT by facedown (Armed in the Heartland)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson