Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Has the Times ever had objective coverage? I don't think so. Before the advent of the digital age it was just easier to cover it up.
1 posted on 10/15/2017 11:53:13 PM PDT by Oshkalaboomboom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Oshkalaboomboom
or do anything else that undercuts The Times’s journalistic reputation.”

They could continue to be totally partisan ad prevaricative and it would not undercut the Times' 21st Century Journalistic reputation.

2 posted on 10/16/2017 12:10:08 AM PDT by arthurus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oshkalaboomboom
Times might try to restore Reputation of half a century ago (undeserved, but there it was) but could never undercut its reputation of the last four decades.
3 posted on 10/16/2017 12:12:34 AM PDT by arthurus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oshkalaboomboom

I might actually have a tiny amount of respect for the Times

if they simply made their reporters announce their liberalism

in print.


4 posted on 10/16/2017 12:23:32 AM PDT by txnativegop (The political left, Mankinds intellectual hemlock)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oshkalaboomboom

The only way to clean out bias in the New York Times is to do to it what the Syrians/Iranians/Hezbollah, Kurds, Russians, Americans, etc. are doing to Raqqa. Raze it to the ground and then salt it.

It too, like Carthage, must be totally destroyed like the media cancer it is.

Perhaps one day an honest researcher/reporter will reveal the extent of treason that the NYT’s has performed against America for the Soviets, Red Chinese, No. Vietnamese, and Cubans (from Duranty to Matthews, Burchett to Pinch Sulzberger) and many others.


5 posted on 10/16/2017 12:29:40 AM PDT by MadMax, the Grinning Reaper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oshkalaboomboom
Most honest observers today would agree the Times, if not trying to lead the Resistance, at least tilts regularly against Trump...

Most honest observers today know that the Times is trying to lead the Resistance and has done so since the final vote tallies came in. Its writers and editors have become fat and lazy basking in their aura of unquestionable certitude and no longer bother to pretend to be even-handed out of a scarcely hidden conviction that they are infallible, where the truth is that they are insufferable.

6 posted on 10/16/2017 12:34:19 AM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oshkalaboomboom

I particularly don’t appreciate their blatant anti-semitism and anti-Israel bias. For this reason, the physical NYT has never been brought into my home and I make a great effort not to click on any NYT stories online either, lest they benefit from it somehow. And lately, they are just a totally liberal shill making no attempt whatsoever to be “fair or balanced”. Therefore, their main use would be to line a parakeet cage or litter box to anyone wanting actual news and not propaganda.


8 posted on 10/16/2017 12:52:22 AM PDT by EinNYC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oshkalaboomboom

Liberal “Journalism”: How can we fool you today?


9 posted on 10/16/2017 3:29:36 AM PDT by winner3000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oshkalaboomboom

What the heck? Journalistic bias IS their reputation!


10 posted on 10/16/2017 3:37:54 AM PDT by workerbee (America finally has an American president again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oshkalaboomboom


"I can't stop drinking and now you want me to stop hating?"

"No, just pretend to stop hating."

"Too complicated! Forget it!"
12 posted on 10/16/2017 4:48:12 AM PDT by \/\/ayne (I regret that I have but one subscription cancellation notice to give to my local newspaper.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oshkalaboomboom

They should be required to express their personal opinions as a matter of full disclosure. Nobody is entirely free of bias, but at least the readers would have the necessary information to evaluate the report.


13 posted on 10/16/2017 6:13:46 AM PDT by Lisbon1940 (No full-term Governors (at the time of election!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oshkalaboomboom

The NYTimes thinks y’all stupid. But people don’t need no **&in’ clues from reporters’ posts on social media to see the bias. Just look at the headlines for “straight” news items the editors concoct.


14 posted on 10/16/2017 6:16:40 AM PDT by Hartmann
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oshkalaboomboom

If this is really happening and will be enforced (for how long?) I am calling this the Harvey Weinstein effect. But the gays run the NYT so do not trust anything from them. The gay and lezz reporters too. Trust and verify.


15 posted on 10/16/2017 6:17:44 AM PDT by dennisw (Once is happenstance. Twice is coincidence. The third time it is enemy action.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oshkalaboomboom

They really need to stop believing that people are stupid. We all know the Times is a Leftist rag, sheesh.


16 posted on 10/16/2017 6:20:33 AM PDT by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson