To: Kaslin
Probably did save lives. In a minute and a half (depending on today's "timeline") someone could easily put 90 rounds M-855 down range into a packed crowd, which would probably kill more than 58 people. If he had used two or 3 x 100 round ShureFire mags we're probably looking at well over 200. The stampede would account for most the 500 injuries.
BTW, has anyone heard a count for the number of people shot vs. the number trampled?
To: InABunkerUnderSF
BTW, has anyone heard a count for the number of people shot vs. the number trampled? I have not. But I am interested in this as well.
I did read that quite of few of those injured were soon released. (I don't recall the number). I presume they did not receive a bullet, but may have been trampled or struck by bullet fragments/shrapnel.
To: InABunkerUnderSF
BTW, has anyone heard a count for the number of people shot vs. the number trampled? I seriously doubt we ever will, it simply doesn't fit the agenda.
8 posted on
10/13/2017 4:14:45 PM PDT by
null and void
(The internet gave everyone a mouth. It gave no one a brain.)
To: InABunkerUnderSF
>>BTW, has anyone heard a count for the number of people shot vs. the number trampled?
I have not, but like you, expect that the stampede was the cause of around half of the injuries. I wonder if, with HIPPA, we will ever know. It is something we should know just so we know more about how to best respond to horrible events similar to this.
12 posted on
10/13/2017 4:25:02 PM PDT by
FreedomPoster
(Islam delenda est)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson