Physicist Howard Hayden's one-letter disproof of global warming claims [pre-Climategate]Dear Administrator Jackson:
I write in regard to the Proposed Endangerment and Cause or Contribute Findings for Greenhouse Gases Under Section 202(a) of the Clean Air Act, Proposed Rule, 74 Fed. Reg. 18,886 (Apr. 24, 2009), the so-called "Endangerment Finding."
It has been often said that the "science is settled" on the issue of CO2 and climate. Let me put this claim to rest with a simple one-letter proof that it is false.
The letter is s, the one that changes model into models. If the science were settled, there would be precisely one model, and it would be in agreement with measurements.
Alternatively, one may ask which one of the twenty-some models settled the science so that all the rest could be discarded along with the research funds that have kept those models alive.
We can take this further. Not a single climate model predicted the current cooling phase. If the science were settled, the model (singular) would have predicted it.
(excerpted from Professor Hayden's letter to Lisa P. Jackson, Administrator Environmental Protection Agency. More at link.)
I just had a thought. Has anyone quantified which nations are most supportive of Anthropomorphic Climate Change and their level of systematic socialism?
It seems to me that the more socialist/communist you are, the more you for climate change as a political issue.
The correlation could be very telling.
If it’s settled, it’s not science.
Stop exhaling if you believe CO2 is a dangerous pollutant.
P4L
I swear - it's really starting to feel like we're winning...
LOL - way to go Christopher Monckton of Brenchley... great post.
Bookmark
bkmk