Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

In victory for Trump, Supreme Court dismisses travel ban case
USAToday ^ | October 10, 2017

Posted on 10/10/2017 5:54:44 PM PDT by SMGFan

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-71 last
To: Bobalu

What the hell gender is that???


61 posted on 10/11/2017 7:08:39 AM PDT by ridesthemiles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: SMGFan

Expect another liberal justice to issue another travel ban in 5....4....3....2....1


62 posted on 10/11/2017 7:10:15 AM PDT by Lazamataz (The "news" networks and papers are bitter, dangerous enemies of the American people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

All that I found...
“The U.S. Supreme Court has dismissed a challenge to President Trump’s temporary travel ban. According to the Court, “we express no view on the merits.””USA Today


63 posted on 10/11/2017 8:06:07 AM PDT by Beautiful_Gracious_Skies ('45 will be the best ever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Sorry. Thought I posted to POST #1. Getting old (63)


64 posted on 10/11/2017 8:46:18 AM PDT by topher (Traditional values -- especially family values -- which have been proven over time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: dp0622
Am I missing the losing or is a LOT getting done? Seems like Trump is accomplishing a lot.

Trump is making progress, but its inch by inch, due to the unprecedented resistance and sabotage he's enduring at rhe hands of the political establishment and the press.

65 posted on 10/11/2017 11:05:15 AM PDT by Windflier (Pitchforks and torches ripen on the vine. Left too long, they become black rifles.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SMGFan
In victory for Trump, Supreme Court dismisses travel ban
INVASION BAN
case
66 posted on 10/11/2017 11:17:37 AM PDT by Jim W N
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dsc; Repeal 16-17; SkyPilot; jimjohn; usnavy_cop_retired; Eleutheria5; Windflier

Relevant issues regarding federal courts including SCOTUS and the 9th Circuit include:

1) Federal courts can and should overturn unconstitutional laws and federal acts but the decision should be based on sound analysis and application of the Constitution as written and originally understood and intended.

2) Other branches AND the states can and should nullify and reject unconstitutional federal court decisions but, again, their notification should be based on sound constitutional analysis and application.

3) The constitution gives both Congress and POTUS investigative powers so either Trump or Congress could investigate the 9th Circuit but IMO, only if probable cause existed for “Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors”, the Constitutional standard for impeachment and removal (U.S.Const. art. II, sec. 4).

Here, Trump has clear constitutional authority to prevent invasion (art. IV, sec. 4 - the “Guarantee Clause”). Illegal immigration and immigration of our enemies are invasion. Trump’s EO here is NOT a “travel ban”. It would have helped if Trump had cited the Guarantee Clause as the main basis of authority for his EO’s but Trump certainly has constitutional authority to proceed with his EO3 invasion ban regardless of unconstitutional court interference.


67 posted on 10/11/2017 12:38:51 PM PDT by Jim W N
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: John O

I was only speaking of Supreme Court Justices. Thanks for the info.


68 posted on 10/11/2017 5:05:46 PM PDT by arrogantsob (Check out "Chaos and Mayhem" at Amazon.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: dsc

The only way of removing a Congressman is by his House. Neither of the other branches can do it.


69 posted on 10/11/2017 5:31:30 PM PDT by arrogantsob (Check out "Chaos and Mayhem" at Amazon.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

The order had expired. It is now a former order and thus moot, hence the dismissal. Anyone elated or deflated about this has no understanding of what happened, which was a big nothing.


70 posted on 10/11/2017 8:06:22 PM PDT by Founding Father (The Pedophile moHAMmudd [PBUH---Pigblood be upon him]; Charles Martel for President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Bobalu

Is that a flaming Hobbit?


71 posted on 10/16/2017 8:40:46 AM PDT by RipSawyer (Racism is racism regardless of the race of the racist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-71 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson