Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Navy Is Set to Retire Half of Its Biggest Surface Combatants—With No Replacement in Sight
Popular Mechanics ^ | Oct 9, 2017 | Kyle Mizokami

Posted on 10/10/2017 11:28:17 AM PDT by sukhoi-30mki

A full half of the U.S. Navy's largest surface warships are set to retire in three years, with nothing available to take their place. Eleven Ticonderoga-class cruisers, each with more than a hundred vertical missile silos, are scheduled to retire starting in 2020. The retirement of these ships will leave a bog hole in the Navy arsenal.

The U.S. Navy's Ticonderoga-class guided missile cruisers were introduced in the 1980s. Weighing nearly 10,000 tons and measuring 567 feet long, the ships were designed primarily for the air defense roles. Equipped with the Aegis Combat System, the Ticonderogas were designed to protect capital ships—such as the Navy's aircraft carriers and the Iowa-class battleships—from mass air attack. Each is capable of carrying a large number of guided missiles.

While earlier ships used a pair of twin-arm missile launchers and have since been retired, the 6th through 27th ships of the class stored their missile armament in huge fields of armored missile silos.

Traditionally, cruisers fill in the gap between battleships and destroyers. Fast and well armed, they were given missions that didn't require the awesome firepower of battleships, but did require more oomph than a destroyer could provide. The Navy is refurbishing half of the remaining 22 Ticonderogas, enough to protect a planned eleven aircraft carriers into the 2030s. But the other eleven ships will start to age out in 2020.

The Ticonderogas were planned to serve 30 or so years, at which point they would be retired and replaced with a newer, more capable ship. The Navy has tried twice to field a replacement, first with the SC-21, or Surface Combatant for the 21st Century program, then the CG(X) program. Both failed, for a variety of reasons. There was

(Excerpt) Read more at popularmechanics.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: cruiser; navy; ships; ticonderoga; usn; warship
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-78 next last

1 posted on 10/10/2017 11:28:17 AM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki
p07
2 posted on 10/10/2017 11:34:15 AM PDT by Snickering Hound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Snickering Hound

Anal orifice. Traitor, communist, America-hater, criminal.


3 posted on 10/10/2017 11:35:51 AM PDT by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Snickering Hound

Most Americans will never know just how thoroughly and how deeply that evil man damaged the national security of these United States.


4 posted on 10/10/2017 11:36:38 AM PDT by NorthMountain (... the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Let me get this straight, we are still using 70 year old B52s with no retirement in sight. So why can’t we update the Ticonderoga class like we did with the Iowa class battleships?


5 posted on 10/10/2017 11:41:22 AM PDT by yuleeyahoo (Those are my principles, and if you do not like them...well I have others. - Groucho Marx)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki
The retirement of these ships will leave a bog hole in the Navy arsenal.

Everywhere you look, swamps needing draining and filling!

Thanks, Obastard! Eight long years to do something about this, but, no -- he had basketball brackets to fill out, had to say the "police acted stupidly," and had beer summits.

6 posted on 10/10/2017 11:42:46 AM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Snickering Hound

Yikes...a smiling traitor.


7 posted on 10/10/2017 11:43:26 AM PDT by hal ogen (First Amendment or Reeducation Camp?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: yuleeyahoo

Ship hulls simply wear out with use. Use a metal warship long enough and you will find the hull is paper thin and barely keeps out water.


8 posted on 10/10/2017 11:43:53 AM PDT by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: yuleeyahoo
From the article:

The Navy is refurbishing half of the remaining 22 Ticonderogas, enough to protect a planned eleven aircraft carriers into the 2030s. But the other eleven ships will start to age out in 2020.

And why aren't we refurbishing ALL of them?

I wonder if Barack HUSSEIN 0bama has an answer to that question.

9 posted on 10/10/2017 11:44:36 AM PDT by NorthMountain (... the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Meanwhile, no one has lifted a finger to bring us that 355 ship Navy Trump promised in his campaign or to repeal sequester. More empty promises to repair the damage of the military hating Obamaites.


10 posted on 10/10/2017 11:47:27 AM PDT by Uncle Sam 911
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Why? Is that an “order”? And if so by whom?


11 posted on 10/10/2017 11:49:06 AM PDT by Harpotoo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Sam 911

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virginia-class_cruiser

Been going on since the 90’s. Clinton scrapped the Virginia CGN’s long before they were due.


12 posted on 10/10/2017 11:52:02 AM PDT by Snickering Hound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: yuleeyahoo
Wife and I toured the Missouri at Pearl some years ago. It had just come out of dry dock with fresh paint and trim.
Even with the addition of the 80’s era missiles, the ship was burdened by 1930s-40s technology. Switching to light oil from N6 reduced its range. Feeding and fireing the 16 inch guns was worrisome.
13 posted on 10/10/2017 11:53:33 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks (Baseball players, gangsters and musicians are remembered. But journalists are forgotten.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Sam 911
Meanwhile, no one has lifted a finger to bring us that 355 ship Navy Trump promised in his campaign or to repeal sequester. More empty promises to repair the damage of the military hating Obamaites.

An Analysis of the Navy’s Fiscal Year 2017 Shipbuilding Plan

14 posted on 10/10/2017 11:57:35 AM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Kind of a BS headline. There’s no replacement in sight because they’re reducing the fleet. We’re still going to have 11 full carrier groups, with no serious naval enemy on our list. Now the platform is aging and probably needs to be replace, but that’s got nothing to do with retiring vessels that no longer fit into our vision or needs.


15 posted on 10/10/2017 11:59:07 AM PDT by discostu (Things are in their place, The heavens are secure, The whole thing explodes in my face)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kabar
The retirement of these ships will leave a bog hole in the Navy arsenal.
16 posted on 10/10/2017 12:00:39 PM PDT by iowamark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: yuleeyahoo

>>Let me get this straight, we are still using 70 year old B52s with no retirement in sight. So why can’t we update the Ticonderoga class like we did with the Iowa class battleships?

I agree. I served on an old nuclear submarine that would have random electrical fires when we were in warm water and pipes would just blow apart at test depth. It needed decommissioning.

But a surface ship doesn’t have the same concerns as a submarine and if it isn’t bursting into flames all the time, it should be upgradable.


17 posted on 10/10/2017 12:02:21 PM PDT by Bryanw92 (Asking a pro athlete for political advice is like asking a cavalry horse for tactical advice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Snickering Hound

18 posted on 10/10/2017 12:03:20 PM PDT by Fiddlstix (Warning! This Is A Subliminal Tagline! Read it at your own risk!(Presented by TagLines R US))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NorthMountain; All

“Most Americans will never know just how thoroughly and how deeply that evil man damaged the national security of these United States.”

He was never held accountable for his abuse of the “Bully Pulpit” which led to the murderzs (20?) of non blacks by black gangs beginning with the Zimmerman trial aftermath.
Everybody knows of Trayvon Martin but no one knows of the Melbourne Australian champion runner Christopher Lane here on a college scholarship from Duncan Oklahoma shot and killed while running down a Duncan street by members of the Crypts because of Obama’s “son” who was killed in “cold blood”..


19 posted on 10/10/2017 12:05:11 PM PDT by mosesdapoet (Mosesdapoet aka L.J.Keslin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

I was involved in the development of the Navy LCS and it was a mess. They kept changing the specifications and broadening the mission in order to keep the funding. They had numerous committees working on the design and engineering changes were coming so fast that the drawings couldn’t even keep up with them. In the end they developed a ship that couldn’t really do a single mission well.


20 posted on 10/10/2017 12:06:13 PM PDT by mbynack (Retired USAF SMSgt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-78 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson