Let’s assume it’s true that the cop (who was doing the job the job that she was being paid to do) truly did save Scalise’s life. Does that mean that Scalise must approve of all aspects of the woman’s lifestyle? Think about the absurd logic behind that. Suppose that some Democrat legislator was saved by a cop who was a racist. Does that mean that the Democrat should abandon his opposition to racism? Or suppose that a Democrat was a great opponent of the tobacco industry, and then was saved by a cop who was a smoker. Would anyone expect the Democrat whose life was saved to suddenly change his position on smoking/tobacco control?
Sounds like a great idea for a sitcom! Call it: “Forced To Match The Savior.” Every week somebody saves someone’s life in the opening segment, then (because it’s in the future) the person whose life was saved must by law change their life to match that of the savior. Hilarity ensues as a Klansman saves a Rabbi, a Communist saves a CFO and a Pentecostal Pastor saves an atheist. Great fun!