Bringing life into the works is the epitome of womanhood. Only women can carry children, by design. And men are required to make that possible. It takes a MAN and a WOMAN to make a new life.
Not a trans couple, not a lesbian couple, not a homosexual couple.
When “science “ starts messing around with the natural order of things, it’s not science. It’s Frankenstein sh*t. No amount of “social engineering “ is going to make it normal, because it’s just not.
The liberal craves baby murder.
Liberals play identity politics to say real women, blacks, homosexuals are Democrats and those who aren’t are traitors to their tribe.
Saying that pro-life women hate their femininity is another way of saying that they are rejecting their tribe.
We need to argue this at a higher level, that their identity politics is a merger of tribe and faith / ideology - regressive instead of progressive.
If I understand the “enlightened” position on womanhood it is this: all that makes someone a woman are two lumps and a hole, natural or artificial doesn’t matter, and being pro-woman means supporting (temporary) chemical sterilization for women who happen to have been born with ovaries and a womb, as opposed to women whose lumps and a hole are surgically created.
Is that about right?