Posted on 10/06/2017 8:02:30 PM PDT by EliRoom8
Video only
I heard they REFUSED to protect the guy cuz he didn’t kneel along with the rest of them.
They were “teaching him a lesson”.
Viewing that gives the NFL trackable viewer stats they can use to generate advertising revenue. Why are you helping the NFL?
he is showing proof that BLM and Whitey don’t. F the NFL.
And in the process is giving the NFL countable views that they can spin as “people are watching football” and therefore use to deny the effectiveness of the boycott - as well as show to advertisers to retain or expand their ad payments.
“Look at how delayed the receivers were to the snap on the last play.” On the second play how did the defense know how to set up???
Carr is out with a fractured back and a black qb is now running things.
How many times has he been sacked this year- up until this game?
Would be next to impossible to say for certain the line allowed those sacks.
Looking at the video I’d say they didn’t.
Is better to play in a sandlot football game than watch the pathetic NFL.
See my tagline
Perfect team for Vegas. Willing to throw games for dumbass reasons.
Is the NFL kind and natural or unkind and unnatural?
The NFL was unnaturalized many years ago, like our military and country.
“Why are you helping the NFL?”
Some are hopelessly hooked to the dope. Even freepers. No will power to kick the drug.
you know whats good though?...the idea of it possibly happening is in the minds of many, many people now and people...those who watch football...will be looking for it...
Lighten up, Francis...
The NFL boycott is going strong, and watching this particular video isn't going to help the league in any tangible way.
Indeed, it's much more likely to damage its credibility even further...
How does viewing a video on Youtube that doesn’t contain any video elements provide advertising data to the NFL?
i know nothing about football so let me insert my foot in my mouth here (why not, everyone loves a conspiracy theory here on FR... where we are all friends, right? ha).
anyway, imho sack four is an obvious hiker (#61) error. he hiked the ball, and the receivers just stood at the line instead of running deep.
this is a fundamental error. was #61 asleep in the huddle when the QB told everyone the hike signal? then #61 hangs forward instead of backing closer to the QB. #61 is effectively neutralizing himself by remaining in an excellent position to block... absolutely no one.
As for the receivers, they are all hanging back for about 1 second. it seems faster on the slo mo replay, but i measure it at about 1 second. that is not very long. in addition, they all come alive and run forward at almost the exact same (delayed) time relative to the hike. that would be very difficult to synchronize if it were deliberate, so i believe that it is not deliberate. so i give the receivers a “pass.”
anyway, IMHO the hiker’s action is enough.
if i were a bookie... well, i thank providence that i am not.
the qb should figure out a convincing back soft tissue injury that would allow him to sit out this season with a fig leaf of impunity. better than risk neck down paralysis or permanent disabling brain injury just for a political difference of perspective.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.