Check THIS out:
Posted on 10/04/2017 5:33:32 PM PDT by Lera
It’s still unclear exactly what the shooter in Las Vegas used to carry out his disgusting attack last night. By all accounts, he had so many weapons that it’ll be a while before we know which ones he chose. Nevertheless, two new pieces of evidence have come to light in the last few hours, and both give us a little insight into who he was and what he was hoping to achieve. The first piece of news is that the killer “passed all required federal background checks” on at least two recent occasions:
(Excerpt) Read more at nationalreview.com ...
Hmmmm
Check THIS out:
How much Ammonia Nitrate was found in the car? A trunk full of 50lb bags or a trace residue?
A Hunter S. Thompson checkout?!?!
Pure AN or lawn fertilizer?
Yeah! Lemme see that girdle!
Question for gun dudes.
When a background check is done, does it show previous purchases of guns?
Shouldn’t there be a heads up after let’s say, a dozen guns?
I’m wondering if all of them were registered to him or someone else was in cahoots with him.
[[How much Ammonia Nitrate was found in the car? A trunk full of 50lb bags or a trace residue?]]
Haven’t see it mentioned
Why would the police department mention a little bag of fertilizer though ? Wouldn’t they just say a little of fertilizer instead of saying ammonia nitrate ?
Bowling and pukimo malaki.
What a sick bastard.
[[Pure AN or lawn fertilizer?]]
Doesn’t say
If it was a little bag of lawn fertilizer would the sheriff not mention it was small bag of lawn fertilizer instead of saying ammonia nitrate ?
One thing is for sure . We are not hearing the entire story
Doesn’t it look like he had some surgery on his throat?
I don’t believe he used more than two weapons. From what I heard it sounded like two different guns being fired.
Let’s say he used four, for argument’s sale,
What good would stopping him after he bought his 12th weapon?
What would that have prevented in the case of the Las Vegas shooting?
If a law wouldn’t have real world results, why even suggest it?
Not trying to be overly critical, but this clearly wouldn’t help.
1. Mandalay Bay hotel is a gun free zone
2. It is illegal to kill people
3. Las Vegas has some strict gun laws, some of which this man broke
Laws are not the problem. We have plenty of them now.
Is he sitting in the pic or is he not that big a guy?
“ammonia nitrate” is an ingredient for a bomb and the other ingredient, which I won’t mention, is even more readily available.
So, why not the grander plan. Personally, I think he was winding down on what money he had. A modest gambling win would have bought him another day.
Single mother, hard scrabble upbringing, high achiever, extreme narcissist, fragile ego, two very short marriages, yells at his girlfriend often enough at Starbucks to be remembered by the staff...watching it all gambled away, knowing deep down -knowing he’s a fool.
Ever see narcissistic rage? I have.
That’s too many coincidences.
that’s a different Steve Paddock. That dude worked at Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Md for many years apparently.
Not same man.
I think I read that he was a small guy, but fit.
[cont.]
NASA, Lockheed Martin => he was “the golden child”.
(Not saying that explains it, but it gives proximaty.)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.