Why is this worth pointing out? Because someday, maybe, well get around to asking: What would have happened if Hillary Clintons very real email scandal with its mountainous evidence of felony mishandling of classified information and destruction of government records had been investigated with the no-holds-barred vigor Mueller and his band of Hillary donors are applying to the surmise of Trump collusion in Russian espionage?
http://www.nationalreview.com/article/451649/robert-mueller-special-counsel-investigation-manafort
Let this be a lesson learned. Special prosecutor appointments need to be limited by:
1) time - require a report to both the DOJ and Congress as to the progress of findings at some future time point.
2) money - establish a budget for the time period above. This will limit the hiring
3) scope - establish clearly what is in scope and require any criminal proceedings discovered outside of the scope to be referred to the DOJ for prosecution.
Don’t forget that Sessions has appointed Whitaker to be his chief of staff.
He has a record of publicly condemning Mueller’s tactics.
He could be Mueller’s nemesis.
I filed my complaint with the DOJ inpector general. here is a copy. feel free to use copy. send out, copy enhance, file your own complaint.
https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B98gBgsg4VB3YjB3c3Z2dFFqMEE
Trump should fire RosenKrantz for not following policy.
Then tell Weasel Mueller that he has 60 days to wrap it up.
Remember Chief Justice Roberts saying that he didn’t think the Supreme Court ought to decide on the acceptance of Obamacare (instead, it ought to be voters).
Analogously, sort of, the enormous disagreement among us on whether or not Trump was legitimately elected needs special handling. Mueller and his team of Clintonites needs extra wide latitude so that, when they find no Trump-side hanky panky, no one can claim that the investigation wasn’t properly done.
I’m willing to be patient.
I furthermore think investigations under way will prove that Clinton and her players are the corrupt ones.