She’s supposedly the smartest woman in the world, with the experience of 20+ political campaigns, yet she didn’t know that you always campaign as if you’re ten votes behind.
But she campaigned like Thomas Dewey, as if it was in the bag. And she lost.
Being a socialist, she blames the collective, not the individual (herself). She’ll never understand. She’ll be an asterisk in history, and the only painting she’ll have in the White House is for being somebody else’s wife. And she’ll die with that frightening feminist realization.
You are correct.
There was such an attitude of feeling as she deserved the job or it was due to her, or it was her turn.
There were quite a number of Democrats that I know who were turned off by her attitude and her campaign. I’m sure most of them still voted for her, but I am pretty sure some stayed home on Election Day.
Gee, the only reason she was ever elected for Senate was for the symbolism she embodied as being someone's wife. And that was the only reason she ever ran for President.
Having never achieved anything on her own merit, but only as the sidekick of a former president, she is a horrible icon for feminism. What is her message to ambitious young women? To find a man they think is going somewhere, marry him, and ride his coattails to success? Somehow, I don't remember the feminists agitating for that back in the 1960s and 70s. In fact, it's the opposite of "A woman needs a man like a fish needs a bicycle" mentality that so many feminists had.
I think she and Jeb! were in on it together. He was supposed to be the R nominee and she was the D nominee and the two of them would ‘spar’, get some zingers in at the debates, campaign and party like hell on other peoples dimes and just like JOHN MCCAIN, Jeb! would gracefulyl say, “Hillary would make a good President” and bada bing, bada boom, President Clinton.
Also, Jeb! would have been low energy and wouldn’t have had many speeches and campaign stops as President Trump did, thereby not bringing attention to Hillary’s physical problems and lack of energy that President Trump exposed.
——Being a socialist, she blames the collective, not the individual (herself)-—
That’s really a profound point....
To take it a step further, she doesn’t consider herself part of the collective, but pretends to be (many examples), but is part of the ruling class over the collective.
which goes a long way to explain the media behavior because they consider themselves part of the ruling class as well
Thank God, we missed that bullet.
Her life has been reduced to putting her diseased mind and diseased heart on display.