To: mandaladon
This simply means that it is time to knock down EVERY NORK launch on ascent.
Do you prefer an unexploded nuke at the bottom of the ocean or a blowed up one above?
2 posted on
09/22/2017 7:24:53 AM PDT by
G Larry
(There is no great virtue in bargaining with the Devil)
To: G Larry
I figure the leftist freaks are going to support NK by telling us he has the right because we blew up nukes in the Pacific, too.
4 posted on
09/22/2017 7:27:34 AM PDT by
treetopsandroofs
(Had FDR been GOP, there would have been no World Wars, just "The Great War" and "Roosevelt's Wars".)
To: G Larry
Do you prefer an unexploded nuke at the bottom of the ocean or a blowed up one above?An unexploded nuke at the bottom of the ocean can be recovered for examination.
To: G Larry
Consider: Blowing up a NORK nuke over NORKland has additional good value besides just destroying the missile.
11 posted on
09/22/2017 7:37:17 AM PDT by
glennaro
To: G Larry
Knock it down and recovery the warhead and find out who designed. North Korea did not. If all hell breaks loose the nation that designed the warhead gets smoked also. That warhead is probably Chinese design via Pakistan
13 posted on
09/22/2017 7:38:51 AM PDT by
cpdiii
(Deckhand, Roughneck, Mud-man, Geologist, Pilot, Pharmacist, CONSTITUTION WORTH DYING FOR!)
To: G Larry
We can immediately detect whether a launch contains radioactive material.
If missile is radioactive, we take it down ASAP and examine the remains.
ANY country throwing & detonating nukes around outside their borders MUST be stopped.
43 posted on
09/22/2017 8:31:40 AM PDT by
ctdonath2
(It's not "white privilege", it's "Puritan work ethic". Behavior begets consequences.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson