Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Kaslin
None of the students were disciplined.

None of the students WAS disciplined.

4 posted on 09/22/2017 5:00:33 AM PDT by Tax-chick ("What comes after diversity is the grim uniformity of Islam." ~Mark Steyn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Tax-chick
I did a grammar check and found that both "were" and "was" are correct.

You're trying to correct Dr Adams?


7 posted on 09/22/2017 5:31:41 AM PDT by Kaslin (Politicians are not born; they are excreted -Civilibus nati sunt; sunt excernitur. (Cicero))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Tax-chick

Not true. It is a myth that “none” can only take a singular verb. If the object of the defining preposition (or implicit appositive) is a plural, then “none” takes a plural verb.

In the example cited, “none of the STUDENTS,” the object is “students” — a plural. If the sentence had read “Of the false accusers, none were punished” the same rule would apply.

If the object was singular, e.g.: “None of the shipment ...” or a collective noun — “None of the herd ...” — then a singular verb (is, was) is proper.

Except in British variants that use plural verbs for collective nouns.

End of lecture ... :)


8 posted on 09/22/2017 5:34:25 AM PDT by IronJack (sh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson