Jay Sekulow or some other high-powered attorney ought to sue on,equal protection grounds: when a woman divorces a woman, it is presumed that they will share joint custody, but when a *man* divorces a woman, it is presumed she will have primary custody...not to mention child support.
The putative justification might have been the tender years doctrine, with women taking care of their newborn, but with lesbians, at most, one of them is the mother: the other has no biological connection to the child, and often *neither* of them do. Why then does biological fatherhood only obligate a man to continue financial provisioning after his wife sunsets their marriage, while at the same time, he has even less rights to his own offspring, than a lesbian to the offspring with whom she has no blood relation at all?
heh... I know a lesbian couple divorcing... the non biological parent is pisssseddd she is gonna have to pay child support.
The courts will just find some random dude and force him to pay child support.