To: clearcarbon
Too late. The science is settled. And they did it all without being able to do the following with any consistency across data sets:
1. Define the “correct” temperature range for the planet.
2. Define the “correct” humidity range for the planet.
3. Define the “correct” mean sea level for the planet.
4. Define the “correct” amount of precipitation for the planet.
5. Define the “correct” makeup of the atmosphere.
6. Define the “correct” amount of sea ice at the N/S poles.
7. Describe/explain past glaciation and subsequent warming without any input from humans.
9 posted on
09/19/2017 1:55:55 AM PDT by
T-Bird45
(It feels like the seventies, and it shouldn't.)
To: T-Bird45
computer models, which were “on the hot side”.
Yeah funny how that data has a way of supporting their conclusions, and not the other way 'round....
To: T-Bird45
computer models, which were “on the hot side”.
Yeah funny how that data has a way of supporting their conclusions, and not the other way 'round....
To: T-Bird45
"And they did it all without being able to do the following with any consistency across data sets:"
After all this time my original question remains: How is "NORMAL" climate defined?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson