Garbage in, garbage out. If you feed a computer false data, you will get false results.
Posted on 09/19/2017 1:07:03 AM PDT by iowamark
What a crock. The time of your execution has been moved out. we still smell some money in your pocket.
The only part to the story that people might be welling to go along with and strongly consider....is the ‘heat-sink’ situation (where concrete and asphalt add up in a urbanized area....like Atlanta for example). In this case however, if they’d cite this and make it an actual real problem...you’d come to a dozen ways to help lessen the issue and not revolve around regulating income or taxing people.
Trump stops gorebull warming in his first year in office. No pansy liberal could ever achieve that.
Occasionally you read these “we were wrong” articles. But then they go on to say they weren’t wrong about the conclusions, just the niggling supporting details needed to draw it.
And they did it all without being able to do the following with any consistency across data sets:
1. Define the “correct” temperature range for the planet.
2. Define the “correct” humidity range for the planet.
3. Define the “correct” mean sea level for the planet.
4. Define the “correct” amount of precipitation for the planet.
5. Define the “correct” makeup of the atmosphere.
6. Define the “correct” amount of sea ice at the N/S poles.
7. Describe/explain past glaciation and subsequent warming without any input from humans.
Wow... I wish they could control the temperature in my apartment complex. The landlord doesn’t turn on the heat until November and there are some pretty cold days to come between now and November.
This crock about ‘controlling’ the earth’s temperature is one of the most laughable aspects of these global warming disciples and their loony predictions.
This dude realized that when he said it was ‘too late’ to do anything that he had gone to far. Let’s face it, if it’s too late then why would any government keep paying him for any more of his phony baloney research? You need to keep those funds flowing if you’re going to maintain the lifestyle that many of these self proclaimed ‘climate scientist’ have been accustomed to living... Jetting around the globe to exotic locals to check the temperatures, and then there are those week long conferences two or three times a year in Paris, New York and Milan.
That stuff doesn’t come cheap. Those air miles alone are worth a fortune when you go travelling on your summer break from university.
Just keep moving the goalposts so they can keep getting more taxpayer funding. So now they have more time as long as you give them more money to fund more studies to ‘fix’ things. When they already admit they had it all wrong.
Sheesh!
Ol' Biff Romney sure wouldn't have.
That’s OK, just perform another revision downward of the historical temperature record, and viola! current warming is back on track.
“Occasionally you read these “we were wrong” articles. But then they go on to say they weren’t wrong about the conclusions, just the niggling supporting details needed to draw it.”
Yah, for sure. They always say that next to China and India the US is the largest polluter. In absolute numbers maybe so. But, if measured or weighted against GDP we are one of the lowest.
I have a different take on this. To me it almost seems like a negotiating tactic, kind of like when you take your kid to the store and they scream for candy at the check out. When you refuse to give in, they say, "Can I just have a little? This small one?", as a way of getting what they want.
Socialism still sucks.
97% of Personal Libertarians agree that CAGW is a hoax.
Cant read the article... subscribe only.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.