Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: central_va
Well how do General! Ain't seen you around these parts. I reckon the only ‘’states rights’’ Mr. Lincoln destroyed was the right to hold another human being in bondage. I suppose you'd agree that California has the right to deify the government over protecting illegal aliens against immigration laws as a matter of ‘’states rights’’?
7 posted on 09/18/2017 2:46:06 PM PDT by jmacusa ("Made it Ma, top of the world!'')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: jmacusa
I reckon the only ‘’states rights’’ Mr. Lincoln destroyed was the right to hold another human being in bondage.

Well console yourself in the knowledge that it wasn't his intention to do so when he began his war.


11 posted on 09/18/2017 3:12:47 PM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: jmacusa

Lincoln centralized power in ways that the authors of Amendment X did not anticipate. He did so to “save the Union,” thus denying the sovereign states their ultimate measure to take when the Federal government encroaches. It had nothing to do with freeing the slaves — as Mr. Lincoln himself admitted. Otherwise, he would have freed those in states that remained in the Union.


45 posted on 09/18/2017 8:45:09 PM PDT by TBP (Progressives lack compassion and tolerance. Only their self-aggrandizement matters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson