Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Rurudyne
Well, there was no evidence of espionage found where they were looking

There is a legal definition of the word "evidence" which is something accepted by a judge to be entered into a case in a court of law. During the entire Clinton administration, this was the definition used by the Clintons and their allies in the media. Since there was no court case, there wasn't any "evidence" even if you personally saw or heard something that they were denying at the time. Think about this every time you hear a Dem say the ....there is no evidence.

40 posted on 09/17/2017 9:47:55 AM PDT by Freee-dame (Best election ever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: Freee-dame

If Dems aren’t looking for it then it doesn’t exist, just ask them.

It’s the flip side to the seriousness of the charges. Or, as I penned the other day:

I’m starting with the man in your mirror,
I’m gonna virtue signal till he changes his ways,
No message could be any clearer,
If you want to make the world a better place the seriousness of the charges can’t go both ways!

... or earlier...

Shhhh ... listen, the DNC flagellant monks approach issuing their mournful lament...

“Mena, Rose Law, Pay for Play! *thwack!* We’d still vote for Hillary....
Mena, Rose Law, Pay for Play! *thwack!* We’d still vote for Hillary....
Mena, Rose Law, Pay for Play! *thwack!* We’d still vote for Hillary....”


43 posted on 09/17/2017 10:33:10 AM PDT by Rurudyne (Standup Philosopher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson