Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jazusamo
I have a question.

If Hillary has been elected, would she be immune from impeachment for these matters because they occurred before her election?

2 posted on 09/14/2017 10:00:49 AM PDT by Buffalo Bob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Buffalo Bob

Nothing is happening to her now, and she wasn’t elected. I can’t imagine anything happening to her if she was elected.

The pile of evidence keeps getting higher & higher, but Crooked Hillary is still on TV everyday treated like a Queen Goddess.

It is really disgusting & I am completely baffled. What do Sessions & President Trump have to gain by not going after her?


4 posted on 09/14/2017 10:06:24 AM PDT by gubamyster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Buffalo Bob

I don’t know the answer but I doubt very strongly that she could be impeached in the present House or any other House.


7 posted on 09/14/2017 10:07:56 AM PDT by jazusamo (Have YOU Donated to Keep Free Republic Up and Running?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Buffalo Bob

Remember, “impeachment” is one of those words that has about 6 differing definitions and I claim no special knowledge of which is correct.

It is hard to imagine how a president would be able to carry out the duties of the office with a revoked security clearance which I would think would be the bare utter minimum punishment for the clear mishandling of classified information.

But then again, any time you try to fit “legal consequences” and “Hillary Clinton” in the same sentence, a logical crevasse or sinkhole opens up and swallows any attempt at reconciling any prior human experience with what may be occurring in the present; as well as any nearby collection of facts that might be laying around. Those are usually replaced by a stack of dead bodies.

So, my answer would be “turnips”.


8 posted on 09/14/2017 10:08:42 AM PDT by Attention Surplus Disorder (Apoplectic is where we want them!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Buffalo Bob

No, because that isn’t protecting Trump.

She would be immune because (D) and no other reason.


9 posted on 09/14/2017 10:09:49 AM PDT by Rurudyne (Standup Philosopher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson