What evidence do you have that Sessions did not take up the investigation? You are blustering crap for which you actually know nothing at all.
You are merely spouting what has become Free Republic dogma.
It is possible there are investigations going on.
Maybe I’m wrong, but any hint of an investigation going on, of HRC, Deep State, the FBI, et cetera, risks the disappearance of people and things and their trails.
In fact, what if this ongoing “feud” between Trump and SESSIONS is a ruse. Let the guilty believe that nothing is happening because Trump is mad at Jeff for inaction.
It’s a reach, I know, because we are all used to getting our news by way of leaks and informants, exposing investigations and setting off signals to the Left to duck.
I believe this is the exact wording you used on a prior thread. How do you know Sessions has done anything at all? You don’t. No one does. He is just a dumb ass politician who made his way into the AG spot to cover for the RINOs. He has to cover all bases. He is doing that by doing nothing.
He recently signed off on Lois Lerner’s non-prosecution. He has made the Awan situation go from Treason to theft. He will not undertake an investigation which Congress has asked for. He will not interact in any way with the FBI.
Sessions has no guts. He has no desire for a fight. That is my opinion. It is not FR Dogma??? What are your qualifications?
He’s either running the mist secretive investigation ever or he’s a dupe and his boss doesn’t give a damn. Perhaps he’s reviewing the papers for indictment as were post.
How about the fact that he's party to Treason? (The Iran Deal was provably Treason.)
I suspect that any investigation into Hillary would reveal links to the Clinton Foundation (i.e. the "Pay to Play" mentioned in the article) and from there to essentially the whole of the Senate, House of Representatives, and many in the Executive [of the time].