How can cancelling something that’s unconstitutional be unconstitutional?
Funny! You could have said that about Obama setting it up in the first place without any regard to the law, Constitution Congress or the will of the people.
The thing about the left is once they “won” something, they never want to give it back.
DACA is unconstitutional, much like the Usurper who enacted it.
Eliminating it is righting the wrong.
Just goes to show that that old phrase is true: You can sue anyone for anything, but it doesn’t mean you’ll win.
The UC suit, filed in U.S. District Court in San Francisco, accuses the administration of “wrongly and unconstitutionally” ending the program on “nothing more than unreasoned executive whim.”
This also speaks to why he will win in the SCOTUS regarding the travel ban.
DOJ should move from summary disposition against anyone challenging the move of DACA to Congress.
Article 1 specifically gives exclusively to to Congress the power to, “establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization...”
Not the President. He can’t wait e or modify immigration law.
DOJ should also ask for frivolous lawsuit sanctions against the schools attorneys and the school, including all attorney fees and costs.
“nothing more than unreasoned executive whim.”
just how it was created.
I’ve now heard of over a DOZEN states and entities who are suing over this.
I have yet to hear of a SINGLE Constitutional precept cited as the basis for the suit.
Not even one.
It’s like they’re all just throwing mud and hoping a federal judge will invent a new law for them.
Sadly, that’s likely to occur.
Janet lacks standing. And DACA is unconstitutional on its face.
Hey Janet - where’s all that missing money??
And just how much does UC rake in, in pell grants and assorted other AA financial aid? Enquiring minds want to know.
They want to make emotional appeals instead of reasoned legal appeals. They are doomed to failure but will be able to say they did all they could.
BTW—UC admin. where is all that missing money?
She has no standing, and no harm has been experienced by any class member.
Get the hell out of my courtroom.
In other words, corrupt Congress let Obama get away with stealing legislative powers to establish DACA, protecting their voting records by doing so.
Unconstitutional DACA probably helped career lawmakers to get reelected simply by publicly supporting it, regardless that they never voted to establish it.
Next, consider that although Trump is accomplishing a LOT as president, it remains that since the uniparty Congress wants to get rid of him that his first two years in office are arguably for practice. That being said ...
Drain the swamp sewer! Drain the sewer!
Remember in November 2018 !
Since corrupt Congress is the biggest part of the sewer (imo) that Trump wants to drain, it is actually up to patriots to drain the sewer in the 2018 elections, patriots supporting Trump by electing as many new members of Congress as they can who will support Trump.
In the meanwhile, patriots need to make sure that there are plenty of Trump-supporting candidates on the primary ballots.
Patriots need to qualify candidates by asking them why the Founding States made the Constitution’s Section 8 of Article I; to limit (cripple) the federal government’s powers.
Patriots also need to make sure that candidates are knowledgeable of the Supreme Court's clarifications of the federal government’s limited powers listed here.
“Congress is not empowered to tax for those purposes which are within the exclusive province of the States.” Justice John Marshall, Gibbons v. Ogden, 1824.
"State inspection laws, health laws, and laws for regulating the internal commerce of a State, and those which respect turnpike roads, ferries, &c. are not within the power granted to Congress [emphases added]." —Gibbons v. Ogden, 1824.
”From the accepted doctrine that the United States is a government of delegated powers, it follows that those not expressly granted, or reasonably to be implied from such as are conferred, are reserved to the states, or to the people. To forestall any suggestion to the contrary, the Tenth Amendment was adopted. The same proposition, otherwise stated, is that powers not granted are prohibited [emphasis added].” —United States v. Butler, 1936.
Also, unlike incumbent members of Congress who wrongly remained silent while misguided state officials abridged the constitutionally enumerated rights of citizens during the lawless Obama Administration, patriots need to make sure that candidates on the 2018 primary ballots commit to the following.
Candidates need to commit to making and enforcing 14th Amendment-related laws to prosecute misguided state officials who use state powers to abridge constitutionally enumerated protections, 1st Amendment-protected religious expression and free speech for example, such actions prohibited by Section 1 of the 14th Amendment.
”14th Amendment, Section 1: All persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States [emphasis added]; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.”
Again, drain the sewer! Drain the sewer!
Isnt this the sister of Judge Napolitano ???
the university must be making a buck or 2 having the illegal alien dacas as students...
The Left is simultaneously suing to keep this EO while suing to stop the travel ban EO. We need some sanity from the judiciary branch ASAP.
I guess UC doesn’t have any professors steeped in the constitution. (I’m looking at YOU, Janice)
A presidential mandate not a law voted upon. Not the law of the land nor constitutionally protected Another presidential mandate can easily undo it, and has.
DACA participants “represent the best of who we are — hard working, resilient and motivated high achievers,”
The DACA is a Presidential reprieve.
It’s not something that can be cancelled.
It can only apply to those to whom it was granted.
If Trump decides to gives us all a 200-year reprieve on paying our 2017 income taxes, he can. And there’s nothing Congress or Trump’s successors could do about it.
so she found her Judge