1 posted on
08/26/2017 4:51:26 AM PDT by
Kaslin
To: Kaslin
2 posted on
08/26/2017 5:02:26 AM PDT by
gaijin
To: Kaslin
Is there anything SJWs can’t screw up beyond all recognition?
3 posted on
08/26/2017 5:03:16 AM PDT by
FreedomPoster
(Islam delenda est)
To: Kaslin
Related, yesterday Ann Barnhardt’s hosting site kicked her off for allegedly violating their “Terms of Service”. Reading the particular term they claim she violated shows it to be an utterly specious claim.
Fortunately, her IT department (a guy who calls himself SuperNerd) managed to get her rehosted in a couple of hours.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3580654/posts
4 posted on
08/26/2017 5:21:49 AM PDT by
DuncanWaring
(The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
To: Kaslin
Google/YT will allow islamists to spew their hate of America, Jews and everything non-muslim and Leftists to rant about anything on the Right, but let someone try to explain that the Confederate statues erected by Southerners were allowed by the winning North to help in the healing process (allow them their heroes) or how conservative speakers are prevented from their speeches because of threats of violence, but no liberal is stopped from speaking because of protests.
Conservatives in America are today's Jews in 1930's Germany.
5 posted on
08/26/2017 5:26:09 AM PDT by
jeffc
(The U.S. media are our enemy)
To: Kaslin
Antifa hates rich people and wants their stuff, right?
Antifa—meet the google shareholders and executives!
6 posted on
08/26/2017 5:47:11 AM PDT by
cgbg
(Hidden behind the social justice warrior mask is corruption and sexual deviance.)
To: Kaslin
Why don’t conservatives start their own version of Youtube?
7 posted on
08/26/2017 6:03:09 AM PDT by
Fiji Hill
To: Kaslin
What alternatives are there to YouTube?
9 posted on
08/26/2017 6:53:49 AM PDT by
Thumper1960
(Trump-2016)
To: Kaslin
Which is a nice way of saying that literally every video on the channel has been demonetized for not being “advertiser friendly.” The criteria used for this determination appear to be entirely illusive, since no amount of changing the video descriptions, or tags, alters whether the videos are deemed advertiser friendly. The real reason, whatever it is, has nothing to do with being "advertiser friendly". If it was just that, then the solution would be to decentralize advertising, by having multiple advertising units. An advertiser just wants their ads run on "kid friendly" videos? Fine, they get a rate and their ads don't run on things like gun tutorials. Your channel getting blocked from monetization by one group would not stop it from getting ad revenue by other groups.
What's happening is that Google/YT is being told to censor viewpoints that the powers-behind-the-scenes don't want viewed.
13 posted on
08/26/2017 1:11:02 PM PDT by
PapaBear3625
(Big governent is attractive to those who think that THEY will be in control of it.)
To: Kaslin
14 posted on
08/26/2017 1:11:12 PM PDT by
Pajamajan
( Pray for our nation. Thank the Lord for everything you u have. Don't wait do it today.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson