Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Nifster

Here’s a hint...my comments are in response to the (massive) over-reaction to Where’s the Outrage’s inital comment in this thread, which was:
_______________________________________________________

My first thought was that old saying “A soldier that won’t F*** won’t fight”

But if they infiltrated the women into a secure area, yea the deserved to be relieved. I have to wonder at the ROE.

______________________________________________________

As you can (hopefully) tell, this comment (and mine) have NOTHING to do with defending what these specific military guys did. If they broke the rules they clearly need to be punished.

Please try and have your facts straight before commenting on one of my posts.


70 posted on 08/25/2017 7:29:05 AM PDT by safeasthebanks ("The most rewarding part, was when he gave me my money!" - Dr. Nick)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]


To: safeasthebanks

My facts are straight

Get your morals in order. Justify sex outside of marriage perhaps even drunken debauchery is hardly a conservative view point


75 posted on 08/25/2017 7:31:51 AM PDT by Nifster (I see puppy dogs in the clouds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson