Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 08/22/2017 7:24:49 PM PDT by TigerLikesRooster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: TigerLikesRooster; AmericanInTokyo; Steel Wolf; nuconvert; MizSterious; endthematrix; ...

P!


2 posted on 08/22/2017 7:25:20 PM PDT by TigerLikesRooster (dead parakeet + lost fishing gear = freep all day)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster

I’m sick of wars. No more wars! Get that McCain and Linda?


3 posted on 08/22/2017 7:27:23 PM PDT by bkopto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster

See...?

It wasn’t really, really over.


4 posted on 08/22/2017 7:29:57 PM PDT by gaijin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Bump


5 posted on 08/22/2017 7:30:46 PM PDT by Jet Jaguar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster

6 posted on 08/22/2017 7:39:02 PM PDT by Bon mots (Laughing at liberal tears!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Yeah! I’m tired of North Korea and their constant blustering. Let’s finish the job once and for all!


7 posted on 08/22/2017 7:41:07 PM PDT by ichabod1 (Smoke does not mean fire when someone threw a smoke grenade.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster

‘Preemptive’ is the word they’re looking for.


8 posted on 08/22/2017 7:45:56 PM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster
I'm afraid St. Thomas Aquinas and I both are uneasy about the concept of striking someone before they strike you. I'm not saying instances can't arise where a preventive war against a tyrant who is about to attack don't exist, and to be sure we've been at war (technically) with North Korea since the 'end' of the Korean War. I'm simply stating it's a slippery slope. Of course, once they take a swing, all bets are off.

Interestingly, the underlying theory would seem to get a cheery two-thumbs up from the antifa crowd:

“The main perspective of Antifa is essentially that rather than simply waiting for the threat to materialize, you stop it from the beginning.(emphasis added)

9 posted on 08/22/2017 7:54:49 PM PDT by DoodleBob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Bannon was right: there is no military option for NK unless you’re willing to send millions of South Koreans to their deaths. The decision boils down to roll the dice on a nuclear NK or accept the same death toll of a nuclear attack from artillery strikes into Seoul.

The only strategy I could see working was if you could evacuate Seoul beforehand (where you’d put all those people, who knows). Tell Kim he can shell an empty city and face instant annihilation or surrender and we’ll give him protective custody on some remote island for the rest of his life.


10 posted on 08/22/2017 7:55:46 PM PDT by MountainWalker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster

North Korea is going to build their missiles and nuclear weapons anyway, even with sanctions and with threats from the U.S.

So, why not destroy their research and development facilities?

Before carrying out any strikes, we should do heavy spying and research to find Kim and his inner circle and all of their missile launching sites. We can then take out their military bases, while neutralizing Kim and his cohorts. Kim can then go back to being the leader of a neutered military and a more impoverished nation.


12 posted on 08/22/2017 8:12:45 PM PDT by adorno (w)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Neocon McMaster cavorting with his compromised elite mentor Petraeus to sow distraction. Petraeus is said to be behind the soft coup of Trump, and by coup is meant either taking Trump out or owning him.

As General Mattis remarked, it will take all of 15 minutes to wipe out N. Korea. There is no need for anything further unless it is for Petraeus’s plan to take back the WH for the Deep State.

What is difficult for so many Americans to believe is just how people like Petraeus would plan such a coup. It’s an easy state of denial. But Petraeus was seen at a talk a few months back talking about just such a plan to start a war with NK.

Globalist elites need a war.

And here we are.


14 posted on 08/22/2017 8:15:40 PM PDT by Hostage (Article V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster
Sounds like they're considering Assertive Disarmament.

National Review, September 10, 1968
17 posted on 08/22/2017 8:51:31 PM PDT by Fiji Hill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson