Piers Morgan may be anti 2nd amendment, but he has been defending Trump.
So if it’s against the law to ‘incite violence’ with speech, then why does the constitution need to be amended?
But does anyone really care what little victories Ben Shapiro of all people has on twitter?
Unless he’s changed, Ben Shapiro has been a major never Trumper from the get go. I don’t care how conservative some pundits claim to be, if one of them hates my president he is my enemy.
The 1st Amendment protects free speech. All forms of free speech. But it doesn’t protect you from the consequences from your fellow citizens for what you say. Thus it promotes self-regulation.
Let idiots say horrible things. They will soon be horribly treated.
I don’t understand the desire to make idiots whisper instead of shout.
I would rather know who the scum in our society is. I would think that for a person of color, quiet racists have to be a lot scarier than overt ones. With that said, I suspect a lot of people think we are all quiet racists even though a vast majority are not.
My favorite argument is that speech everyone agrees with does not need protection.
Were it not for the U.S. and our crazy ways, Britain would be Nazi territory. Ironic.
Meh.
Shapiro’s retorts did not pertain to the original topic.
And it wasn’t that “brutal.”
I lament to infiltration of “clickbait” into FR.
who decides what’s hate speech?.. kind of like who counts the votes
Been Shapiro used to be on the morning answer in L.A.. I am glad they dumped him because he was so anti Trump during the election campaign. He is a winy little punk and his voice is adolescent. He can jump off a cliff as far as I am concerned.
Shapiro. Wrong on President, right on 2nd amendment. Piers right on President, wrong on 2nd amendment