Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: HarleyLady27; LS

You partly make my point. However, the factors of influence on these odd endorsements seem to me to have a more complicated universe than landing on a citation of Trump’s genius.

If we look with our eyes, McMasters needs to be gone already and Strange (R-AL) has all the wrong backers, (bad actors like McConnell), while Mo Brooks (R-AL) seems to be one of us, in spades.

My question asks why would Sundance be differing from the conservative media herd on McMasters? Brietbart, for example, blasts McMasters. Sundance is a dependable Trump supporter, but he did not. (Unless I missed it.)

Sundance was/is suspicious of those pushing McMasters out. And, Trump defends McMasters, as well. Bannon reportedly recommended McMasters, or was among those who approved him.

The NSC, imho, is no place to have McMaster’s firing three of Trump’s swamp killers, without wondering about why. The NSC is no place for sabotage by McMaster because the president wants to watch him.

What’s to watch? Who is left to do the watching? Bannon was kicked out. The aides who differed with McMaster are fired. Who are the observers of McMaster now? According to the media implications, there are none left.


6 posted on 08/10/2017 11:49:51 AM PDT by RitaOK (Viva Christo Rey! Public Education/Academia are the farm team for more Marxists coming... infinitum.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: RitaOK

http://nypost.com/2017/08/09/theres-another-feud-brewing-in-trumps-white-house/

This is an article on Bannon and McMaster...I never seen where Bannon supported McMaster...and Breitbart has been against McMaster for some time now...

Do you have links to anything different?


7 posted on 08/10/2017 12:18:21 PM PDT by HarleyLady27 ( "The Force Awakens!!!"...Trump and Pence: MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: RitaOK

With due respect Rita, you don’t know what you’re talking about.

I was with Bannon last Friday. He and McM have differences. So did Hamilton and Jefferson. So did Seward and Stanton. It’s in ALL administrations. Schultz and Weinberger differed in Reagan’s administration.

Bannon, Gorka, Pompeo, Sessions (who, yes, is on the NSC) comprise a very powerful lobby, even if Bannon isn’t a voting member. He still attends. They are as powerful, if not more so, than McM. If you want an admin with absolutely no different views, no dissenting voices, you’ll end up with a Third Reich. Bannon doesn’t want that and Trump doesn’t want that.

Trump took ALL our advice (including Bannon’s) to hire McM. Try trusting him.


8 posted on 08/10/2017 12:20:25 PM PDT by LS ("Castles Made of Sand, Fall in the Sea . . . Eventually" (Hendrix))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: RitaOK
Sundance was/is suspicious of those pushing McMasters out.

Sometimes Sundance is off.

11 posted on 08/10/2017 12:30:22 PM PDT by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson