That's now the second time you've accused me of "us[ing]".."a green tint." After the first accusation, I said I made no such manipulation and told you how you could verify my claim. Now you're back accusing me falsely again, after apparently making no effort to verifying what I said. That's rude, incorrect, and shows poor argumentation skill.
You've wildly conjectured that the SlipNslide(R) changed colour, offering no evidence to substantiate your claim. I here below show two Puentes frames, both without and with the slip and slide. There has been no color manipulation of any kind.
Off to the left in the first image is the port rear baggage pod door and floor that we saw in posts #157 and #173. Everyone else will notice how the colour thereof differs greatly with the SlipNSlide in the lower picture, even though the colouring of the plane, nearby water and its surroundings are essentially the same. Those cannot, therefore, account for the wide colour difference seen between the baggage pod piece in the water and the SlipNSlide.
As to "why [I] bother," be assured it's not all about convincing you. You've already shown you're not interested in getting to the truth of the matter. You're just into seeding doubt, wasting people's time and wanting to marginalize the items under discussion. You're the one that has here introduced the idea of anyone "spending two billion dollars." Those with better reading comprehension skills have already noted that the only $2B mentioned previously was as a cost to have built the submarine, not an expenditure to "get rid of one woman." Yours is a clearly ridiculous summation, one of many we've seen from you in a thread-worn attempt to make your adversaries look kooky. We disown your flame-throwing, literary Molotov cocktails, such as "they were ALL meant to die" and your "newly minted shape shifted cosmetically enhanced Fuddy." Those are what's "obviously not working."