“You are trying to make an argument that was lost a long time ago. Good luck selling your lemon.”
Your missing his point. Robots make stuff. No one builds robots to make stuff unless there is someone to buy the stuff. If no one has a job and no one can afford to buy stuff then companies will not make it. There will be equilibrium. Most of the stuff we have in our homes was made, in part, by robots. 150 years ago they did not have robots... and they had less, and less complicated, stuff. So more robots = cheaper stuff = people have more stuff.
I am an engineer. I use a computer to get stuff done that would have taken longer by hand 80 years ago... but is there LESS demand for engineers? No. Ditto for lots and lots of industries. Someone made a device for bartenders to mix drinks faster... and bartenders still have jobs.
Most of the stuff we have in our homes was made, in part, by robots. 150 years ago they did not have robots... and they had less, and less complicated, stuff. So more robots = cheaper stuff = people have more stuff.
Real nice, Talon.
Our minds think of robots as some futuristic thing -- walking/talking servants or the mass adoption of those huge robotic welding machines that help build cars.
But robots include smaller gadgets that allow work to be done faster. Even a small computer program that increased an individual worker's productivity is a mini-robot.
And so, looked on in that way, robots are already pervasive. They are merely hiding in Excel sheets, wine bottle openers -- automated gadgets on a large or small scale.
What do ya think?