Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Dustoff45

With one engine off, wouldn’t the other be driving both rotors? I can’t imagine that would be very fuel efficient if the engine is doing a lot more work than it was designed for.


16 posted on 08/04/2017 6:35:14 AM PDT by smokingfrog ( sleep with one eye open (<o> ---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: smokingfrog

No, only one engine would be pushing. Pillows compensate by adjusting the surface controls.


19 posted on 08/04/2017 7:11:28 AM PDT by Excellence (Marine mom since April 11, 2014)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: smokingfrog
I can’t imagine that would be very fuel efficient

Yes, with one engine out, power still goes to both rotors. There is enough power to maintain level flight at about 80 knots. Of course the one engine is using a little more fuel on one engine, less what the other engine no longer is drawing, then when both engines were online.

I would bet the USMC has figured this out with the 3 engine CH-53E. Shut one down and watch the range go up. The theory is those gas turbines use about the same amount of fuel no matter if you are pulling lots of torque or not. And one less engine

Just really curious what Boeing knew about their flight.

Gee - if that last engine goes out, we might be up here all day, lol

25 posted on 08/04/2017 8:24:21 AM PDT by Dustoff45 (Pass the spicy catsup. We've got Trump now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson