Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

China’s weaponization of trade
Live Mint ^ | Aug 01 2017 | Brahma Chellaney

Posted on 07/31/2017 8:50:44 PM PDT by TigerLikesRooster

China’s weaponization of trade

China has encouraged and then exploited other countries’ economic reliance on it to compel their support for its foreign-policy objectives

Brahma Chellaney

China denies mixing business with politics, yet it has long used trade to punish countries that refuse to toe its line. China’s recent heavy-handed economic sanctioning of South Korea, in response to that country’s decision to deploy the Terminal High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD) anti-missile system, was just the latest example of the Chinese authorities’ use of trade as a political weapon.

China’s government has encouraged and then exploited states’ economic reliance on it to compel their support for its foreign-policy objectives. Its economic punishments range from restricting imports or informally boycotting goods to halting strategic exports (such as rare earth minerals) and encouraging domestic protests against specific foreign businesses. Other tools include suspending tourist travel and blocking fishing access. All are used carefully to avoid disruption that could harm China’s own business interests.

Mongolia became a classic case of such geo-economic coercion, after it hosted the Dalai Lama last November. With China accounting for 90% of Mongolian exports, the Chinese authorities set out to teach Mongolia a lesson. After imposing punitive fees on its exports, Chinese foreign minister Wang Yi voiced “hope that Mongolia has taken this lesson to heart” and that it would “scrupulously abide by its promise” not to invite the Tibetan spiritual leader again.

A more famous case was China’s trade reprisals against Norway, after the 2010 Nobel Peace Prize was awarded to the jailed Chinese dissident Liu Xiaobo. As a result, Norwegian salmon exports to China collapsed.

(Excerpt) Read more at livemint.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: china; india; skorea; trade
There are many in U.S. who encouraged and abetted this weaponization. Some built their career around it. Others just loved China's cheap labor and cash. Others mistakenly choose to ignore the China's behavior, fearing that it would undermine their sacrosanct ideology.
1 posted on 07/31/2017 8:50:45 PM PDT by TigerLikesRooster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster; Jeff Head; Tainan; hedgetrimmer; Unam Sanctam; taxesareforever; Avenger; ...

P!


2 posted on 07/31/2017 8:52:11 PM PDT by TigerLikesRooster (dead parakeet + lost fishing gear = freep all day)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster
Correction

(acknowledging) it would undermine their sacrosanct ideology

3 posted on 07/31/2017 9:19:58 PM PDT by TigerLikesRooster (dead parakeet + lost fishing gear = freep all day)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Agreed. What kind of people buy hundreds of billions of dollars of produce from their enemies? Actually transferring their own industry in the process! What kind of people do this?


4 posted on 07/31/2017 9:26:17 PM PDT by veracious (UN = OIC = Islam ; Democrats may change USAgov completely, just amend USConstitution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

If only we would “ weaponize” trade with our enemy Communist China.


5 posted on 08/01/2017 12:01:21 AM PDT by A strike (Academia is almost as racist as Madison Ave.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #6 Removed by Moderator

To: TigerLikesRooster

It is time for the USA to progressively reduce to termination, perhaps over two or three years, all trade with China. Yes, it will raise prices. And yes it will kick China in the gut.


7 posted on 08/01/2017 4:53:40 AM PDT by arthurus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOPe Means Bend Over Spell Run

I don’t like the term “uniparty” at all. I have used it but it is too contrived. I prefer “Government Party.”


8 posted on 08/01/2017 4:55:34 AM PDT by arthurus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: veracious

Greedy people do, that’s who.


9 posted on 08/01/2017 6:06:46 AM PDT by houeto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster
Great summation of what happened. The rot started when Nixon opened the window. I know in Canada that the entire political establishment (Liberal Party and its shipping connections) are pretty much in the graces of the ChiComs.
10 posted on 08/01/2017 11:34:10 AM PDT by Sam Gamgee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: arthurus

We have become addicted to Chinese pieces of crap at dollar stores. I think we can weather it better than them. Your plan of course will never happen, but we can dream.


11 posted on 08/01/2017 11:35:22 AM PDT by Sam Gamgee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster
China’s weaponization of trade

We can thank that Dawg Bill Clinton for giving China the necessary technology to build up their weapons against the good ole USA. Isn't the Dawg special. Not!!!

BTW, I wonder how much was contributed to the Clinton Foundation Spending Fund for giving China the weapons it needs to try and dominate the U.S.A. and the rest of the World!

The Chinese will pay dearly for their saber rattling against us and all civilized humanity!!!

12 posted on 08/01/2017 1:39:38 PM PDT by TheConservativeTejano (God Bless Texas...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson