1 posted on
07/30/2017 5:26:47 PM PDT by
BenLurkin
To: BenLurkin
2 posted on
07/30/2017 5:27:43 PM PDT by
dfwgator
To: BenLurkin
Mecca needs more Buddah Shrines.
3 posted on
07/30/2017 5:30:01 PM PDT by
Paladin2
(No spelchk nor wrong word auto substition on mobile dev. Please be intelligent and deal with it....)
To: BenLurkin
There is a great risk that these two Gulf States will really get into it, and start a military conflict.
4 posted on
07/30/2017 5:30:37 PM PDT by
BlackVeil
('The past is never dead. It's not even past.' William Faulkner)
To: BenLurkin
They could farm the job out to people who are used to managing international access to holy sites. I’m sure the Israelis would do a great job.
To: BenLurkin
6 posted on
07/30/2017 5:32:59 PM PDT by
tgusa
(gun control: hitting your target.)
To: BenLurkin
SA would make great extra parking space for Israeli attractions.
9 posted on
07/30/2017 5:38:18 PM PDT by
Caipirabob
(Communists... Socialists... Democrats...Traitors... Who can tell the difference?)
To: BenLurkin
But it’s okay that the UN says Israel can’t have Temple Mount or even Jerusalem.
11 posted on
07/30/2017 5:41:23 PM PDT by
SkyDancer
(You know they invented wheelbarrows to teach FAA inspectors to walk on their hind legs.)
To: BenLurkin
Good, let them kill each other.
14 posted on
07/30/2017 5:50:16 PM PDT by
wastedyears
(Iron Maiden can't be fought)
To: BenLurkin
The damn Saudi’s are jumping on the Fake News band wagon!
15 posted on
07/30/2017 5:52:44 PM PDT by
Delta 21
To: BenLurkin
As The Bug said to Edgar, “Your proposal is acceptable.”
16 posted on
07/30/2017 6:16:24 PM PDT by
null and void
(ObamaCare, giving the government the power of life and death over Americans since March 23, 2010...)
To: BenLurkin
“Qatar’s demands to internationalize the holy sites is aggressive and a declaration of war against the kingdom,”
Does this mean the saudi’s are raging against globalization?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
