Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 07/28/2017 9:05:11 AM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Oldeconomybuyer

Since when is the law interpreted by “how many will be harmed?”

If that’s the law of the land we may as well pack up and go home, we’re screwed.


2 posted on 07/28/2017 9:14:54 AM PDT by Kenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

And the native birthrate plunges into a little steeper of a screaming nosedive...


5 posted on 07/28/2017 11:11:12 AM PDT by ALongRoadAhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

“Harm”??? How many women would be “harmed”?

For one thing, simply aborting a child “harms” the woman, as has been shown in studies. And these pills themselves can also harm a woman. But what about the “harm” to the unborn baby? There is so much that is screwed up in the whole abortion issue.


6 posted on 07/28/2017 11:35:05 AM PDT by mtrott
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson