The amount of corruption in between elections, the amount of collusion with foreign government in between elections, the making of US policy based on input (info and $$$$$$$) from foreign agents between elections -- that dwarfs the corruption involved as part of the elections.
Focusing the public on the election campaign process, as if what follows is honest government, pretty much completely overlooks where the corruption is taking place.
There is a department that already knows the skinny on the dossier and who paid for it.
Sessions need only care enough to frigging ask, hear and report it.
Anything less is complicity, at this point.
That is why they had to get rid of Trump. Nobody owns him, and that is a threat to them. But the crimes in governance that take place on an everyday basis are just called “politics”. What happened in these elections are actual CRIMES committed by agencies and their heads, in collusion with the media. The crimes go all the way to the top. They reveal that what is kept hidden under the guise of “national security” is actually a deep-state coup against the US Constitution and the American people.
At this point, our intel agencies should be forced to give public justification for even existing. The white hats within those communities need to step up, need to be given immunity so they can say what is necessary to preserve the true purpose of the agencies - or else the agencies need to simply be dismantled, as the only way to drain the swamp and stop the crimes. From those ashes new security could arise, but anybody within the old agencies would have to be excluded (except any white hats who might have tried to preserve the true purposes) and definite checks and balances would have to be in place.
There will always be rotten players. Our Founders knew that. They knew that the CRUCIAL issue was whether there were checks and balances. Elections are a check on power. Supposedly. With a crooked media and crooked agencies that check doesn’t really function any more. The Tenth Amendment was supposed to be a check, and if it were followed there wouldn’t be reason for foreign or domestic entities to fight over the spoils, because the government would not have the role of choosing the winners and losers. But choosing winners and losers - the definition of government corruption - is considered just normal governance now.
I think the place to start with the public is to show not just CORRUPTION (which the public has accepted as the status quo by now) but the CRIMES of the political parties’ leaders, their allies, and our government agencies themselves. Those crimes were used to put certain people in place who would continue the corruption. Until that happens the law is toothless, the Constitution is dead, and the citizenry is hopeless.