Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 07/26/2017 9:18:23 AM PDT by Hojczyk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Hojczyk
I may be wrong, but I think that it in some way violates the MagnaCarta.
2 posted on 07/26/2017 9:30:54 AM PDT by SandRat (Duty, Honor, Country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hojczyk

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4730974/US-doctor-offered-help-Charlie-Gard-speaks-out.html

what a sad situation...


3 posted on 07/26/2017 9:32:37 AM PDT by wyowolf (Be ware when the preachers take over the Republican party...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hojczyk
The author makes good points here, but using the Charlie Gard case as an example of "individual liberty fading into the mist" sounds bizarre to me.

If the people of Great Britain were truly free, Charlie Gard probably would have died a long time ago.

This is the moral and philosophical paradox of this kind of story ... enjoying the benefits of a totalitarian, government-run health care system while it works in your favor, then complaining about the brutal totalitarian nature of the system when it renders a decision you don't like?

4 posted on 07/26/2017 9:35:15 AM PDT by Alberta's Child ("I was elected to represent the citizens of Pittsburgh, not Paris." -- President Trump, 6/1/2017)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hojczyk

The fact that they did not want to pay....okay, they’re death culture Socialists.

But they would not even allow them to take their child out of the country? What in the hell did we fight to keep them on this side of the Berlin Wall for?


5 posted on 07/26/2017 9:38:07 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hojczyk
Remember Hillary Clinton's famous response when challenged on what she and President Obama really knew about the Benghazi attackers in real time, while Americans were being murdered as the administration did nothing: what difference, at this point, does it make? "At this point," as I wrote at that time, gave the game away.
The “game” that it gave away is the Hillary didn’t give a **** about “Chris” - as she referred to Ambassador Stevens - or any other person not currently useful to Hillary. Emphatically including the families of the fallen.

A characteristic which clearly made her “the most qualified person ever to run for the presidency.”

</sarcasm>

16 posted on 07/26/2017 10:30:12 AM PDT by conservatism_IS_compassion (A press can be 'associated,' or a press can be independent. Demand independent presses.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson