No, I did not. My remarks as to what Mueller is in fact investigating are at most conditional. post 46 ...
Mueller is WAY OUT OF LINE if [<- That is the conditional] he is looking for crimes not associated with the Trump campaign, which didn't even exist before 2015.
At post 78, I describe my view of the scope, without reference to what Mueller might be investigating.
At post 84, I argued that a Manafort money laundering case is outside Mueller's jurisdiction. I did not argue that Mueller was or was not investigating that case, only that it was not properly Mueller's.
At post 120, I expressly said that "Neither of us needs to know for a fact what Mueller is investigating."
The rest of our back and forth turns on the question I put to you at post 109 ...
So how exactly is "Mueller's authorization includes events not related to the Trump campaign" a misstatment of your position?
One more time
A trail that leads to needing to investigate ties to russian mobsters .money laundering criminals...and real estate transactions can ABSOLUTELY be part of the scope.
You are claiming it cannot. Is that right?