Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: simpson96
there was not actual malice in a recent editorial

Their editorials are 100% malice.

2 posted on 07/17/2017 12:06:16 PM PDT by ClearCase_guy (Islam: You have to just love a "religion" based on rape and sex slavery.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: ClearCase_guy

https://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/03/business/media/gawker-hulk-hogan-settlement.html

These attorneys sued Gawker and Gawker is now...gone.


5 posted on 07/17/2017 12:09:42 PM PDT by Principled (OMG I'm so tired of all this winning...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: ClearCase_guy

Malice in the dictionary sense doesn’t matter. The issue is constitutional malice as defined by the Supreme Court in NY Times v. Sullivan. It’s a tough burden for any public figure to meet.


10 posted on 07/17/2017 12:47:33 PM PDT by colorado tanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson