[Zeppo]

The newspaper said in court papers late Friday that its prompt and full correction of an editorial that referenced Palin's political action committee nullifies her claims.

That might possibly fly, except for that little inconvenient fact that the correction was neither made promptly nor was it a full correction.

The New York Times habitually lies. This is just par for the course.

After all, when you're The New York Times, actual facts are such inconvenient things, huh...

[az_gila]

A really half-a**ed retraction that didn’t mention Palin -

“An earlier version of this editorial incorrectly stated that a link existed between political incitement and the 2011 shooting of Representative Gabby Giffords,” the Times’ correction said. “In fact, no such link was established.”