Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: WilliamIII

There will always be winners and losers when the government involves themseslves in health-care coverage. Those who won under Obamacare will lose under Trumpcare. Those who lost under Obamacare will win under Trumpcare. That’s just the way it is.


3 posted on 07/15/2017 12:12:05 PM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: DoodleDawg; All
"There will always be winners and losers when the government involves themseslves in health-care coverage. Those who won under Obamacare will lose under Trumpcare. Those who lost under Obamacare will win under Trumpcare. That’s just the way it is."

Good point !

Sen. Cruz's amendment evidently supports free market.

H O W E V E R …

Evidently neither Cruz, or insurers that would win under Trumpcare, seem to understand that, regardless what lawless Obama’s state sovereignty-ignoring activist justices wanted everybody to think about the Obamacare insurance mandate, they wrongly ignored that previous generations of state sovereignty-respecting justices had clarified the following.

Simply put, the scope of Congress’s Commerce Clause powers (1.8.3) don’t include regulating insurance. This is because insurance is based on contracts, and the Court clarified that contracts are not commerce, regardless if the parties negotiating a contract are domiciled in different states.

So while Cruz is demonstrating uncommon common sense with respect to promoting free, fair market, I don’t know why he doesn’t argue that the states have never expressly constitutionally delegated to the uniparty Congress the specific power to regulate insurance.

Corrections, insights welcome.

10 posted on 07/15/2017 12:34:31 PM PDT by Amendment10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson