Posted on 07/14/2017 4:35:15 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
It’s always hard in politics for people to take their opponents’ views seriously, but it has become ever harder in Trump’s America. People are more engaged with politics, but only because they want to beat the other side, not understand it. This means scholars have a greater responsibility than ever to help ordinary citizens understand how the people with whom they disagree think, and what their political opponents are actually doing.
Most scholars get this. For example, political scientists and historians, who tend to range from the political center to the left wing, have written extensively about the origins and development of American conservatism. Rick Perlstein, the left-wing historian, has written intelligently and sensitively about the Barry Goldwater movement and the rise of the modern US right. Jefferson Decker at Rutgers University has carefully tracked how reaction against the role of the federal government in Western public lands gave rise to conservative public interest law.
Angus Burgin has thoroughly dug into the history of the Mont Pelerin Society, founded by Friedrich Hayek in 1947, showing how a transnational network of free market thinkers helped change the global conversation on political economy. One of us (Teles) devoted years to making sense of how conservative foundations helped shape the academic discipline of law and economics, build the Federalist Society, and, more recently, support criminal justice reform. And this barely scratches the surface of high-quality scholarship across multiple disciplines on conservatism.
This kind of work is not just important because it involves scholarly objectivity and generosity — although that is true. It’s also important because even when it doesn’t promote agreement, it promotes smarter politics. Intelligent partisans want to understand what truly motivates their opponents.....
(Excerpt) Read more at vox.com ...
Sorry, but “i tellectual left” is an oxymoron.
If those “scholars” wanted to get a clue, all they have to do is read the Constitution as written.
Not the way they wish it was written.
“Intellectual left”? Ha! Liberals act on emotion, not logic. If they operated on logic, they would know that socialism ultimately cannot and will not work.
Bingo.
Intellectual- Someone who can’t DO anything of value, so he talks a lot and expects to get paid for it.
The “intellectual left” moved into the libertarian (small l) wing of the conservative sector. The Left is now entirely totalitarian and completely devoid of actual liberalism.
The terms have been redefined. The sad thing is that these lefties are clueless of their own belief system and are incapable of seeing the inevitable results of their ideas if left unopposed. They believe that slavery is freedom. Where did I read that before?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.