Something for the anti-frackers.
1 posted on
07/14/2017 3:59:26 PM PDT by
Oatka
To: Oatka
...and should own the raw materials manufacturing for various plastics based industries.
2 posted on
07/14/2017 4:14:40 PM PDT by
spokeshave
(The Fake Media tried to stop us from going to the White House, I am President and they are not. DJT)
To: Oatka
Thank you Donald Trump, you old “Can’t get anything done” President. I guess this one just slipped through the system despite the White House being in absolute turmoil.
3 posted on
07/14/2017 4:16:29 PM PDT by
InterceptPoint
(Ted, you finally endorsed. About time.)
To: Oatka
Can we not see the night and day in where we were and where we are going.
4 posted on
07/14/2017 4:18:36 PM PDT by
ronnie raygun
(Trump plays chess the rest are still playing checkers)
To: Oatka
We would have already been number one were it not for Obama, nimbys, and granola crunchers. We have the gas, but we don't have the maritime terminals—yet.
To: Oatka
11 posted on
07/14/2017 5:27:32 PM PDT by
Thibodeaux
(Democrat calls for kumbaya must be met with their blood on the ground)
To: Oatka
Maybe they could lower the price and increase domestic demand and not ship it overseas.
18 posted on
07/14/2017 7:37:05 PM PDT by
central_va
(I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
To: Oatka
U.S. on Track to Be Worlds No.2 LNG Exporter ooops. No clue what LNG is, was reading it as LGBT.
Does that make me a racist or a homophobe.??
19 posted on
07/14/2017 7:43:10 PM PDT by
Veto!
(Political Correctness Offends Me)
To: Oatka
Please understand that I am not a greenie or warmist and I think that this is great news for the economy of the United States. I would have no problem living next to a LNG facility, but...
Cleveland Ohio has a history with LNG, specifically the great disaster of 1944. You can read a contemporaneous report here... http://www.fireengineering.com/content/dam/fe/online-articles/documents/2016/FE194411EastOhioArt1.pdf
This all happened 73 years ago and obviously the technology involved in handling LNG is vastly different today, but, any LNG facility had better be guarded with security on the level of Fort Knox or a nuclear weapons site as a successful terrorist attack on a modern LNG storage site would have a yield comparable with early atomic weapons. It has been estimated that the 1944 blast was in the neighborhood of 1/6 the yield of the Hiroshima weapon.
20 posted on
07/14/2017 8:48:40 PM PDT by
ADemocratNoMore
(The Fourth Estate is now the Fifth Column)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson