Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: conservative98

Guess they never heard of the 9-0 ruling by the Supremes.


2 posted on 07/13/2017 9:24:47 PM PDT by mfish13 (Elections have Consequences.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: mfish13

You must not have read the entire sentence.


19 posted on 07/13/2017 10:18:55 PM PDT by Dave W
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: mfish13
Guess they never heard of the 9-0 ruling by the Supremes.

No, this is EXACTLY what Justice Thomas predicted in his separate opinion:

Moreover, I fear that the Court’s remedy will prove unworkable. Today’s compromise will burden executive officials with the task of deciding—on peril of contempt— whether individuals from the six affected nations who wish to enter the United States have a sufficient connection to a person or entity in this country. See ante, at 11– 12. The compromise also will invite a flood of litigation until this case is finally resolved on the merits, as parties and courts struggle to determine what exactly constitutes a “bona fide relationship,” who precisely has a “credible claim” to that relationship, and whether the claimed relationship was formed “simply to avoid §2(c)” of Executive Order No. 13780, ante, at 11, 12. And litigation of the factual and legal issues that are likely to arise will presumably be directed to the two District Courts whose initial orders in these cases this Court has now— unanimously—found sufficiently questionable to be stayed as to the vast majority of the people potentially affected.

45 posted on 07/14/2017 3:43:32 AM PDT by Yo-Yo (Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson