Liberals think health care for the unborn (prenatal care) is a constitutional right but the unborn receiving the benefits has no rights.
The author infers that the unborn have the same rights as the born. They aren’t even citizens yet.
The concept is easy to understand Constitutionally,morally and ethically. It’s impossible to convince or have the left understand because they have been socially engineered and morally corrupted. With them,forget the original/textural Constitution,it only has value to them when it suits a selfish socialist agenda. killing comes natural to them and it’s quite shocking how they have not hit bottom yet.
Writing like this always makes me feel so stoooopid!
Some folks have the gift of an “economy of style”.
(a very groovy phrase, but not mine. Taken from Fricke’s description of Eric Clapton’s guitar playing).
Get the clear, meaning of things down in few words, with simple phrasing, proper assumptions and un-deniable conclusions.
Kudos to the author.
#MAGA
#Build the Wall
Excellent post.
Since Griswold v. Connecticut in 1965, how many births were prevented or aborted? Certainly over 100 million. Thanks to scotus, American society isn’t replacing itself. Instead, third-worlders and muzzies fill the void.
No court decision can legitimately harm the societal foundation of our republic. If a newly discovered “right” from scotus harms society, it isn’t a right.
bump for further reading
Please FreepMail me if you want on or off my Pro-Life Ping List.
Does anyone know if James Wilson was argued in those cases, or since, in cases pertaining to abortion?
James Wilson, one of six men to sign both the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution and a member of the first Supreme Court, lectured on constitutional law with Washington, Adams, and Jefferson in attendance – ostensibly endorsing his interpretations. As such, scholars typically concede that "Wilson, when speaking on the law, might be said to be speaking for the Founders generally."
During one such lecture, "Of the Natural Rights of Individuals," Wilson clarified: "In the contemplation of law, life begins when the infant is first able to stir in the womb. By the law, life is protected not only from immediate destruction, but from every degree of actual violence, and, in some cases, from every degree of danger."
Wilson's explanation unequivocally guarantees the right to life for a fetus. "When the infant is first able to stir in the womb" refers to the "quickening," which Bouvier's Law Dictionary and Concise Encyclopedia, Volume 3 (originally published in 1839) describes as "the sensation a mother has of the motion of the child she has conceived." This was the moment in which a mother of the 18th century would know for certain that she was pregnant.
Abortion is murder and everyone knows it. The only people who think abortion should be legal are people who hate the US Constitution. And that would be the globalists who love a silly utopia where one government at the top controls everyone in the world. Thankfully, God does not use a fake utopia to maintain total power.
It seems odd if a pregnant is killed in an automobile accident the person at fault is charged with double homicide, but if a woman want a doctor to kill her unborn child then Democrats claim it perfectly okay. So is murder a murder except when it is not a murder?