Posted on 07/05/2017 5:54:05 AM PDT by simpson96
Edited on 07/05/2017 8:12:42 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]
ATLANTA (AP)
(Excerpt) Read more at wsav.com ...
Plus Russian interference.
Did DIMS raise any concerns about/objections to Georgia’s touch-screen voting system prior to the election?
Didn’t think so.
Maybe Roseanna, Roseanna, danna....was after all a Republican?!!! It’s always something, if it’s not one thing, it’s another!!!!.....Democrats must work and pay a lot of dough for rigging elections that we have not discovered just yet....and then try and bring up something they thought would work but didn’t???!!!
...when, if they’d really stop being so full of themselves and their money, if they’d turn to God, we’d see an amazing transformation in our great country. But as one general said during a weather event, “You can’t fix stupid!!”...so as long as they want to stay there, that is what they appear to be.
Handel’s been sworn in. It’s a bit late, tough crap.
Boy, do we need a “loser-pays” system!
Any chads involved?
Ha! Funny how these voting machines ONLY malfunction when the DimRat loses. Otherwise, they seem to work just fine....right, Georgie $orass?
I say subpoena Jeh Johnson and Obama for why it was detected that DHS IP’s showed up with trying to break into the Georgia voting system.
In spite of all their money, all their lies, all their fake polls, all their cheating, the backing and support of the FAKE news media, THEY STILL LOST!
They just can’t see that it’s their CANDIDATES that SUCK!
I’m sure that the so-called “Coalition for Good Governance” and the same six Georgia voters would be just as concerned and litigious if Ossoff had won.
NOT!!
Typical
Those of audience who like to refer to the fall of the Roman Republic will recall that what led Caesar to cross the Rubicon with his army was a dispute over an election. This is an imperfect comparison at best because the details of the two disputes are different.
But what I do point to is the ongoing challenges being continually raised by the Democratic Party to election results they don’t like. Elections are supposed to be decisive. But if the results are always under challenge by the losers and the machinery of the election itself is painted as corrupt, how soon before the appeal to force of arms (or the threat of force of arms) emerges as the only sure way to resolve the matter?
The Al Gore effect. Before Gore, it was considered harmful to the country to challenge an election. Since then, the challenge has become a standard strategy for Democrats.
I agree.
Be careful what you ask for, loser Dims.
Exactly. It’s the new normal. Rats challenge every election they lose. Fn Gore started this BS. Trump needs to play hardball with the voter fraud investigation.
Plus Trump is crazy.
The reason they are so angry at election results that go against them is that they didn’t cheat ENOUGH.
BTW, when was the last time the Democrats won an honest election? Certainly not in my lifetime. And I am 76!
Spend even MORE of your cash.
(:
“Rats challenge every election they lose”
And they try to impeach every Republican who becomes President. It’s SOP for Communists.
Doesn’t the Constitution say that “each house will be the judge of its elections”? If that’s the case, I can’t see this lawsuit going anywhere.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.