Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The ghost squadron: As £3.1billion Big Lizzie aircraft carrier goes to sea without any planes ...
MAILONLINE ^ | 28 June 2017 | PADDY DINHAM

Posted on 06/28/2017 5:37:20 AM PDT by sukhoi-30mki

The £3.1billion HMS Queen Elizabeth aircraft carrier proudly hit the waters earlier this week - but currently its crew only has replica planes to practise with.

Life-size models of the F-35 Lightning II jets have dubbed the 'faux fighters' and will be pushed around the tarmac at Cornwall's RNAS Culdrose, so flight deck teams can get a feel for the world's most advanced warplanes.

The real jets will be deployed on the 65,000-tonne Queen Elizabeth - dubbed 'Big Lizzie' - was put into the sea for the first time in Scotland.

Life-size copies of the F-35 Lightning II jets will be pushed around the tarmac at Cornwall's RNAS Culdrose by HMS Queen Elizabeth crews

The arrival of the four jets was announced by the Flight Deck School, which will provide training to enable air handlers to manage fast jets and helicopters.

Chief petty officer Paul Ranson, Training Manager for all Embarked Training explained: 'We need to provide as realistic training as possible before the trainees go to sea.

'Aircraft handlers are vital to the new carrier, without them the Royal Navy cannot conduct safe aviation at sea.

'Flight decks are very dangerous, at sea even more so. It's our job to protect the aircraft and aircrew flying them.

'Managing the flight deck is mentally and physically challenging, so the training has to be quite rigorous and as realistic as possible'.

Despite having no engines, sensors or weapons the four replica F-35s, dubbed the 'faux fighters' by the team at Culdrose, will be used as training aids so naval personnel can get used to moving bigger and heavier aircraft.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4646526/Navy-uses-replica-train-Big-Lizzie-flight-deck-teams.html#ixzz4lIfMZYlH Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: f35; hmsqueenelizabeth; royalnavy; warship

1 posted on 06/28/2017 5:37:20 AM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

There is no doubt we had to split from this country.


2 posted on 06/28/2017 5:41:16 AM PDT by Delta 21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Delta 21

Gas turbines suck up a lot of fuel thus will need to be accompanied by tankers.


3 posted on 06/28/2017 5:44:23 AM PDT by dblshot (I am John Galt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Delta 21

This was the ship’s initial sea trials, people! No one takes aircraft to sea the first time the ship gets underway. The first order of business is always to sort out the ship, herself. Standard procedure in the USN as well.


4 posted on 06/28/2017 6:14:35 AM PDT by Pecos (A Constitutional republic shouldnÂ’t need to hold its collective breath in fear of lawyers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: dblshot

Lots of folks plum fergot about the petrochemical shortage. Maybe they burn that $20/gal organic. HA

I am sure it will be a formidable warship when its air wings are aboard. Even the US carriers dont take on birds till after deployment, but the thought of the Brits pushing around fake planes brought visions of Charlie Sheen in a bad comedy. Then throw in all the fancy purposeful misspellings.........


5 posted on 06/28/2017 6:18:23 AM PDT by Delta 21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki
Ha...Brits...the professional amateurs...with a long history


6 posted on 06/28/2017 6:19:53 AM PDT by spokeshave (In the Thatch Weave,..Trump's Wing Man is Truth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dblshot
Gas turbines suck up a lot of fuel thus will need to be accompanied by tankers.

So do aircraft, which is why U.S. carriers are accompanied by tankers as well.

7 posted on 06/28/2017 6:32:14 AM PDT by Lower Deck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki
I think they would have been much better served to build several in the 30 - 40K ton range.
Easier to disperse, protect, man, and maintain.
8 posted on 06/28/2017 6:39:18 AM PDT by Psalm 73 ("Gentlemen, you can't fight in here - this is the War Room".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki
All You Need To Know About The Royal Navy's New Carrier And Its Maiden Voyage
The War Zone - By Joseph Trevithick June 26, 2017
9 posted on 06/28/2017 11:27:00 AM PDT by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now it is your turn ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki
In the meantime they can use these aircraft.
ping
10 posted on 06/28/2017 2:42:45 PM PDT by minnesota_bound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Delta 21

Has anyone else noticed that these ships lack any missile for defense?


11 posted on 06/28/2017 5:57:08 PM PDT by rmlew ("Mosques are our barracks, minarets our bayonets, domes our helmets, the believers our soldiers.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Sad.

L


12 posted on 06/28/2017 5:58:11 PM PDT by Lurker (America burned the witch.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson