Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MosesKnows

It wouldn’t solve anything. The biggest problem is that we want health insurance to be a constant cost reducer, not insurance. Insurance is for catastrophic loss. Our goal for health insurance is ostensibly to spread the cost, but we don’t want to just spread the cost, we want to get more out of it than we put into it. And that can’t happen. As long as we demand health insurance defy the laws of physics, as long as we rail against up being up, it’ll never satisfy our demands. It literally cannot work.


4 posted on 06/27/2017 12:56:52 PM PDT by discostu (You are what you is, and that's all it is, you ain't what you're not, so see what you got.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: discostu

“we want to get more out of it than we put into it”

Clearest explanation of the moochers take on “Insurance”.

Spot on Moses. Catastrophic plans are “Insurance”, 3rd parties paying for an office visit is nuts.


9 posted on 06/27/2017 1:11:49 PM PDT by Macoozie (Handcuffs and Orange Jumpsuits)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson