Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. Ruled by Executive, Legislative, Judicial Branches… and Richard Cordray
The American Spectator ^ | June 22, 2017 | Jon Cassidy

Posted on 06/23/2017 10:14:57 AM PDT by Cheerio

A despotism in our midst no one can do anything about, evidently.

Could Congress create a fourth branch of government?

Maybe break off a piece of what the executive branch handles now — commerce, say, or agriculture, or maybe even defense — and create a new office supported by its own dedicated tax stream and the authority to levy penalties? The president could still appoint this officer — I think prince-bishop has a nice ring to it — but wouldn’t be able to remove His Excellency absent extraordinary factual circumstances.

Maybe we could expect the prince-bishop to decree exile for certain troublemakers, or to restore forjugement, as our system came to embrace anachronism.

We could have a fifth and a sixth branch. Or why not 20 branches? Actually, Texas already has something like this — an executive branch fractured into tiny independent jurisdictions, and the results are about as exciting as Liechtenstein.

The Consumer Finance Protection Bureau is something like a new branch of government, only former Solicitor General Ted Olson doesn’t call it the fourth branch. He says the administrative commissions invented during the New Deal represent the fourth branch, and that the CFPB is something even further from our original Constitutional order. Something close to the despotisms of old, I’d say.

(Excerpt) Read more at spectator.org ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: cfpb; conventionofstates; cordray; govtabuse; richardcordray; statesrights

1 posted on 06/23/2017 10:14:58 AM PDT by Cheerio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Cheerio
Could Congress create a fourth branch of government

We already have a fourth branch of government: any department that creates regulations which no one approved.

2 posted on 06/23/2017 10:20:32 AM PDT by laweeks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cheerio

I’d be a whole lot more cost effective if we just utilized the tool allowed us in The Constitution specifically for stomping the totalitarianism out of an out of control government.


3 posted on 06/23/2017 10:20:51 AM PDT by Grimmy (equivocation is but the first step along the road to capitulation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cheerio
Barry is a great campaigner. Just ask him and he will tell you. lol

But seriously, he couldn't do any worse than Nancy, could he?

4 posted on 06/23/2017 10:34:24 AM PDT by Phlap (REDNECK@LIBARTS.EDU)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cheerio

Ever since my masochistic baby went and left me, I’ve got nothing to punch but the clock.


5 posted on 06/23/2017 10:55:29 AM PDT by Phlap (REDNECK@LIBARTS.EDU)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cheerio
Could Congress create a fourth branch of government? Maybe break off a piece of what the executive branch handles now — commerce, say, or agriculture, or maybe even defense — and create a new office supported by its own dedicated tax stream and the authority to levy penalties?

It's unconstitutional but they have already done that.

It's called the IRS.


6 posted on 06/23/2017 3:16:16 PM PDT by Vlad The Inhaler (Best Long Term Prepper Tactic: Beat The Muslim Demographic Tsnami - Have Big Families)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cheerio

Thanks for posting. Cordray is bad news. According to the article, there are few reasons to dismiss him, although at the end of the article it seemed like he was being discriminatory.


7 posted on 06/23/2017 8:59:43 PM PDT by Whenifhow (when, if and how will Obama be gone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cheerio

At the state level the executive branch can be effectively and accountability be fractured into separate dedicated elected officials for each area.

We have in most states Separately elected Attorney generals.
Separately elected education department head.
We also separate elected Land commissioner(for collecting royalty on western state lands).

All elected specifically by the people for their respective policies in their respective area of expertise.

Only in Washington do we have to elect one President, who chooses all theses people and thus for better or worse makes all theses policies. I’m sorry but if you think the President can’t obstruct or interfere with his employee’s activities your crazy.

But if you think that is a good idea to create an executive employee unaccountable to elected officials, your even more crazy. That’s called a dictator and they tend to do even more crazy dictatorial stuff on their own initiative than the federal employees in black robes have done in response to other people’s initiative.


8 posted on 06/24/2017 4:06:54 PM PDT by Monorprise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson