Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mr. Mojo

I say put a special “entertainers tax” of 100% on income above minimum wage. You want confiscatory Marxism, kids ? You got it.


8 posted on 06/22/2017 10:04:32 PM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (Je Suis Pepe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: fieldmarshaldj

You’re being mean; let them keep the livable wage of $15 an hour.


14 posted on 06/22/2017 10:15:57 PM PDT by Betty Jane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: fieldmarshaldj

I’ve been gravitating toward permitting a wealth tax on those with net worth over $1 billion. It seems most are all too anxious to demand higher government spending on their favorite social peacocking causes du jour. But I’d be happy to jump on the bandwagon for an entertainers tax as you described. The funniest thing is those like Gervais referring to his kind as elite, when there is nothing except wealth that imputes elitism about them.


15 posted on 06/22/2017 10:17:15 PM PDT by Sgt_Schultze (When your business model depends on slave labor, you're always going to need more slaves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: fieldmarshaldj
IIRC Clinton proposed a special tax rule that would have done (did?) the opposite. It would have made money earned by an entertainer (concert, sports, etc) when in a location (state other than their state of residence) for only a few days not subject to as much tax as it would have been without the special rule.

I seem to remember Barbara Streisand being an example of someone this would have applied to. Does anyone else remember this?

57 posted on 06/23/2017 4:12:34 AM PDT by Freee-dame (Best election ever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson